Selecting Metrics That Matter: Comparing the Use of the Countermovement Jump for Performance Profiling, Neuromuscular Fatigue Monitoring, and Injury Rehabilitation Testing
-
- Chris Bishop
- London Sport Institute at Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom;
-
- Matt Jordan
- Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada;
-
- Lorena Torres-Ronda
- Spanish Basketball Federation, Madrid, Spain;
-
- Irineu Loturco
- Nucleus of High Performance, Sao Paulo, Brazil;
-
- John Harry
- Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas;
-
- Adam Virgile
- Los Angeles Clippers Basketball, Los Angeles, California;
-
- Peter Mundy
- Hawkins Dynamics, Portland, Maine; and
-
- Anthony Turner
- London Sport Institute at Middlesex University, London, United Kingdom;
-
- Paul Comfort
- Directorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title> <jats:p>The countermovement jump (CMJ) is one of the most used performance assessments in strength and conditioning. Although numerous studies discuss the usability of different metrics in this test, this is often performed within the context of a specific aim. However, to our knowledge, no information currently exists providing practitioners with some over-arching recommendations on which metrics to choose when the purpose of using the test differs. This article discusses how the metrics selected to monitor during CMJ testing may differ when aiming to use it as a proxy for athletic performance, as part of neuromuscular fatigue monitoring, or as part of a test battery for return to performance in injured athletes.</jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Strength & Conditioning Journal
-
Strength & Conditioning Journal 45 (5), 545-553, 2023-01-09
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)