Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) nadir ozone profiles using ozonesonde measurements

  • Ray Nassar
    School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA
  • Jennifer A. Logan
    School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA
  • Helen M. Worden
    Atmospheric Chemistry Division National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder Colorado USA
  • Inna A. Megretskaia
    School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA
  • Kevin W. Bowman
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena California USA
  • Gregory B. Osterman
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena California USA
  • Anne M. Thompson
    Department of Meteorology Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA
  • David W. Tarasick
    Experimental Studies, Air Quality Research Division Environment Canada Downsview, Ontario Canada
  • Shermane Austin
    Medgar Evers College City University of New York Brooklyn New York USA
  • Hans Claude
    Deutscher Wetterdienst Meteorologisches Observatorium Hohenpeissenberg Hohenpeissenberg Germany
  • Manvendra K. Dubey
    Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos New Mexico USA
  • Wayne K. Hocking
    Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Western Ontario London, Ontario Canada
  • Bryan J. Johnson
    NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder Colorado USA
  • Everette Joseph
    Physics and Astronomy Department Howard University Washington District of Columbia USA
  • John Merrill
    Graduate School of Oceanography University of Rhode Island Narragansett Rhode Island USA
  • Gary A. Morris
    Department of Physics and Astronomy Valparaiso University Valparaiso Indiana USA
  • Mike Newchurch
    National Space Science and Technology Center, Atmospheric Science Department University of Alabama in Huntsville Huntsville Alabama USA
  • Samuel J. Oltmans
    NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder Colorado USA
  • Françoise Posny
    Laboratoire de l'Atmosphère et des Cyclones CNRS/Université de la Réunion La Réunion France
  • F. J. Schmidlin
    Laboratory for Hydrospheric Processes, Observational Science Branch NASA/Wallops Flight Facility Wallops Island Virginia USA
  • Holger Vömel
    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Studies University of Colorado Boulder Colorado USA
  • David N. Whiteman
    Mesoscale Atmospheric Processes Branch, Goddard Space Flight Center NASA Greenbelt Maryland USA
  • Jacquelyn C. Witte
    Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Branch, Goddard Space Flight Center NASA/Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Greenbelt Maryland USA

説明

<jats:p>We compare Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) version 2 (V002) nadir ozone profiles with ozonesonde profiles from the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment Ozonesonde Network Study, the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Data Center, the Global Monitoring Division of the Earth System Research Laboratory, and the Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesonde archives. Approximately 1600 coincidences spanning 72.5°S–80.3°N from October 2004 to October 2006 are found. The TES averaging kernel and constraint are applied to the ozonesonde data to account for the TES measurement sensitivity and vertical resolution. TES sonde differences are examined in six latitude zones after excluding profiles with thick high clouds. Values for the bias and standard deviation are determined using correlations of mean values of TES ozone and sonde ozone in the upper troposphere (UT) and lower troposphere (LT). The UT biases range from 2.9 to 10.6 ppbv, and the LT biases range from 3.7 to 9.2 ppbv, excluding the Arctic and Antarctic LT where TES sensitivity is low. A similar approach is used to assess seasonal differences in the northern midlatitudes where the density and frequency of sonde measurements are greatest. These results are briefly compared to TES V001 ozone validation work which also used ozonesondes but was carried out prior to improvements in the radiometric calibration and ozone retrieval in V002. Overall, the large number of TES and sonde comparisons indicate a positive bias of approximately 3–10 ppbv for the TES V002 nadir ozone data set and have helped to identify areas of potential improvement for future retrieval versions.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (6)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ