The BCR/ABL‐inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib differentially affect NK cell reactivity

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), BCR/ABL‐mediated oncogenic signaling can be targeted with the BCR/ABL‐inhibitors Imatinib, Nilotinib and Dasatinib. However, these agents may also affect anti‐tumor immunity. Here, we analyzed the effects of the 3 BCR/ABL‐inhibitors on natural killer (NK) cell reactivity. Exposure of CML cells (K562, Meg‐01) to pharmacological concentrations of Imatinib, Nilotinib and Dasatinib diminished expression of ligands for the activating immunoreceptor NKG2D to a similar extent. This resulted in comparably reduced NK cell cytotoxicity and IFN‐γ production. When direct effects on NK cell responses to K562 and primary CML cells as well as activating cytokines were studied, Dasatinib was found to abrogate NK cytotoxicity and cytokine production. Nilotinib did not alter cytotoxicity but, at high levels, impaired NK cytokine production, while Imatinib had no direct influence on NK cell reactivity. Of note, Nilotinib, but not the other BCR/ABL‐inhibitors increased cell death within the preferentially cytokine‐secreting CD56<jats:sup>bright</jats:sup>CD16<jats:sup>−</jats:sup> NK cell subset, which may, at least in part, serve to explain the effect of Nilotinib on NK cytokine production. Analysis of NK cell signaling revealed that Dasatinib inhibited proximal signaling events leading to decreased phosphorylation of PI3K and ERK that are crucial for NK cell reactivity. Imatinib and Nilotinib, in contrast, showed no relevant effect on NK cell PI3K or ERK activity. In light of the potential role of NK cells in the immunesurveillance of residual leukemia and for future combinatory immunotherapeutic approaches, our data indicate that choice and dosing of the most suitable BCR/ABL‐inhibitor for a given patient require careful consideration.</jats:p>