Attention bias modification training for adolescents with chronic pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

  • Lauren C. Heathcote
    Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
  • Konrad Jacobs
    Oxford Centre for Children and Young People in Pain (OxCYPP), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Dimitri M.L. Van Ryckeghem
    Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Emma Fisher
    Centre for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
  • Christopher Eccleston
    Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Elaine Fox
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Jennifer Y.F. Lau
    Department of Psychology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

抄録

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Attention bias for pain-related information is theorised to maintain chronic pain, indicating that changing this bias could improve pain-related outcomes. Modifying attention biases in adolescents, when chronic pain often first emerges, may be particularly beneficial. We report here a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial of attention bias modification (ABM) training in adolescents with chronic noncancer pain. Adolescent patients (N = 66) were randomly assigned to complete multiple sessions of dot-probe ABM training (N = 23), placebo training (N = 22), or no training (waitlist; N = 21) across a period of 4 weeks. Patients completed all assessments at a hospital-based pediatric pain clinic and completed all training at home. We examined the relative effects of ABM on attention bias and attention control, as well as pain symptomatology (primary outcome), pain catastrophizing, anxiety and depression symptoms, and functional disability (secondary outcomes) immediately after training and 3 months later. We found no evidence that ABM changed attention bias or attention control in comparison with placebo training or no training. We also found that pain and pain-related outcomes were no different for those undergoing ABM compared with placebo training or no training when tested immediately after training or 3 months later. Overall, we found no evidence to support the efficacy of dot-probe ABM for improving pain-related outcomes in adolescents with chronic pain. This study was registered on the NIHR Clinical Research Network Portfolio in August 2014 (UK Clinical Trials Gateway: CPMS 17251) and funded by a Research Training Fellowship awarded to Lauren Heathcote by Action Medical Research for Children.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Pain

    Pain 159 (2), 239-251, 2017-09-29

    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ