Characteristics of functional bowel disorder patients: a cross‐sectional survey using the Rome III criteria

  • A. C. Ford
    Leeds Gastroenterology Institute St. James's University Hospital Leeds UK
  • P. Bercik
    Gastroenterology Division Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute McMaster University Health Sciences Center Hamilton ON Canada
  • D. G. Morgan
    Gastroenterology Department St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton ON Canada
  • C. Bolino
    Gastroenterology Division Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute McMaster University Health Sciences Center Hamilton ON Canada
  • M. I. Pintos‐Sanchez
    Gastroenterology Division Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute McMaster University Health Sciences Center Hamilton ON Canada
  • P. Moayyedi
    Gastroenterology Division Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute McMaster University Health Sciences Center Hamilton ON Canada

説明

<jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>There is some evidence that, despite attempts to classify them separately, functional bowel disorders are not distinct entities and that such divisions are artificial.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>To examine this issue in a large cohort of secondary care patients.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Consecutive, unselected adults with gastrointestinal (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">GI</jats:styled-content>) symptoms attending out‐patient clinics at two hospitals in Hamilton, Ontario were recruited. Demographic data, symptoms and presence of anxiety, depression or somatisation were collected prospectively. We used validated questionnaires, including the Rome <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">III</jats:styled-content> questionnaire, with patients categorised as having irritable bowel syndrome (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">IBS</jats:styled-content>), functional diarrhoea or chronic idiopathic constipation (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CIC</jats:styled-content>). We compared data between these disorders, and measured degree of overlap between them by suspending their mutual exclusivity.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Of 3656 patients providing complete lower <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">GI</jats:styled-content> symptom data, 1551 (42.4%) met criteria for a functional bowel disorder. Diarrhoea‐predominant <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">IBS</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">IBS</jats:styled-content>‐D) patients were younger, and more were female, met criteria for anxiety, and reported somatisation‐type behaviour, compared with functional diarrhoea. Only loose, mushy or watery stools were more common in functional diarrhoea. When mutual exclusivity was suspended, overlap occurred in 27.6%. Constipation‐predominant <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">IBS</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">IBS</jats:styled-content>‐C) patients were younger, and more were female, had never married, reported anxiety type symptoms and exhibited somatisation‐type behaviour. One in five <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CIC</jats:styled-content> patients reported abdominal pain or discomfort. All constipation symptoms were more common in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">IBS</jats:styled-content>‐C. When the mutual exclusivity was suspended, overlap occurred in 18.1%.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>There were significant differences in demographics between individuals with functional bowel disorders. Despite this, the Rome <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">III</jats:styled-content> classification system falls short of describing unique entities.</jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ