Language Matters: Denying the Existence of the 30‐Million‐Word Gap Has Serious Consequences
-
- Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
- University of Delaware
-
- Erika Hoff
- Florida Atlantic University
-
- Meredith L. Rowe
- Harvard University Graduate School of Education
-
- Catherine S. Tamis‐LeMonda
- New York University
-
- Kathy Hirsh‐Pasek
- Temple University and Brookings Institute
説明
<jats:p>Sperry, Sperry, and Miller (2018) aim to debunk what is called the 30‐million‐word gap by claiming that children from lower income households hear more speech than Hart and Risley (1995) reported. We address why the 30‐million‐word gap should not be abandoned, and the importance of retaining focus on the vital ingredient to language learning—quality speech directed to children rather than overheard speech, the focus of Sperry et al.'s argument. Three issues are addressed: Whether there is a language gap; the characteristics of speech that promote language development; and the importance of language in school achievement. There are serious risks to claims that low‐income children, on average, hear sufficient, high‐quality language relative to peers from higher income homes.</jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Child Development
-
Child Development 90 (3), 985-992, 2018-08-13
Wiley
