Efficacy of systemic therapies in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer harboring germline <i>ATM</i> versus <i>BRCA2</i> mutations
-
- Alexandra O. Sokolova
- Division of Medical Oncology Oregon Health Science University Portland Oregon USA
-
- Catherine H. Marshall
- Division on Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Baltimore Maryland USA
-
- Rebeca Lozano
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Division on Medical Oncology Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO) Madrid Spain
-
- Roman Gulati
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington USA
-
- Elisa M. Ledet
- Systems Engineering and Operations Research Department George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USA
-
- Navonil De Sarkar
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington USA
-
- Petros Grivas
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington USA
-
- Celestia S. Higano
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington USA
-
- Bruce Montgomery
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
-
- Peter S. Nelson
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington USA
-
- David Olmos
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Division on Medical Oncology Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO) Madrid Spain
-
- Vadim Sokolov
- Systems Engineering and Operations Research Department George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USA
-
- Michael T. Schweizer
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington USA
-
- Todd A. Yezefski
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
-
- Evan Y. Yu
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington USA
-
- Channing J. Paller
- Division on Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Baltimore Maryland USA
-
- Oliver Sartor
- Division on Medical Oncology Tulane University School of Medicine New Orleans Louisiana USA
-
- Elena Castro
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Division on Medical Oncology Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO) Madrid Spain
-
- Emmanuel S. Antonarakis
- Division on Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Baltimore Maryland USA
-
- Heather H. Cheng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington USA
抄録
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Among men with metastatic prostate cancer, about 10% have germline alterations in DNA damage response genes. Most studies have examined <jats:italic>BRCA2</jats:italic> alone or an aggregate of <jats:italic>BRCA1/2</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>ATM</jats:italic>. Emerging data suggest that <jats:italic>ATM</jats:italic> mutations may have distinct biology and warrant individual evaluation. The objective of this study is to determine whether response to prostate cancer systemic therapies differs between men with germline mutations in <jats:italic>ATM</jats:italic> (g<jats:italic>ATM)</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>BRCA2</jats:italic> (g<jats:italic>BRCA2)</jats:italic>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This is an international multicenter retrospective matched cohort study of men with prostate cancer harboring g<jats:italic>ATM</jats:italic> or g<jats:italic>BRCA2</jats:italic>. PSA<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> response (≥50% decline in prostate‐specific antigen) was compared using Fisher's exact test.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results and Limitations</jats:title><jats:p>The study included 45 g<jats:italic>ATM</jats:italic> and 45 g<jats:italic>BRCA2</jats:italic> patients, matched on stage and year of germline testing. Patients with g<jats:italic>ATM</jats:italic> and g<jats:italic>BRCA2</jats:italic> had similar age, Gleason grade, and PSA at diagnosis. We did not observe differences in PSA<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> responses to abiraterone, enzalutamide, or docetaxel in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer between the two groups; however, 0/7 with g<jats:italic>ATM</jats:italic> and 12/14 with g<jats:italic>BRCA2</jats:italic> achieved PSA<jats:sub>50</jats:sub> response to PARPi (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001). Median (95% confidence interval) overall survival from diagnosis to death was 10.9 years (9.5‐not reached) versus 9.9 years (7.1‐not reached, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .07) for the g<jats:italic>ATM</jats:italic> and g<jats:italic>BRCA2</jats:italic> cohorts, respectively. Limitations include the retrospective design and lack of mutation zygosity data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Conventional therapies can be effective in g<jats:italic>ATM</jats:italic> carriers and should be considered before PARPi, which shows limited efficacy in this group. Men with g<jats:italic>ATM</jats:italic> mutations warrant prioritization for novel treatment strategies.</jats:p></jats:sec>
収録刊行物
-
- The Prostate
-
The Prostate 81 (16), 1382-1389, 2021-09-13
Wiley