-
- Irina Degtiar
- Mathematica, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA;
-
- Sherri Rose
- Department of Health Policy and Center for Health Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA;
抄録
<jats:p>When assessing causal effects, determining the target population to which the results are intended to generalize is a critical decision. Randomized and observational studies each have strengths and limitations for estimating causal effects in a target population. Estimates from randomized data may have internal validity but are often not representative of the target population. Observational data may better reflect the target population, and hence be more likely to have external validity, but are subject to potential bias due to unmeasured confounding. While much of the causal inference literature has focused on addressing internal validity bias, both internal and external validity are necessary for unbiased estimates in a target population. This article presents a framework for addressing external validity bias, including a synthesis of approaches for generalizability and transportability, and the assumptions they require, as well as tests for the heterogeneity of treatment effects and differences between study and target populations.</jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
-
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 10 (1), 501-524, 2023-03-10
Annual Reviews