Effect of an artificial intelligence-based quality improvement system on efficacy of a computer-aided detection system in colonoscopy: a four-group parallel study

  • Liwen Yao
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Lihui Zhang
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Jun Liu
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Wei Zhou
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Chunping He
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Jun Zhang
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Lianlian Wu
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Hongguang Wang
    Department of Gastroenterology, Jilin Renmin Hospital, Jilin, China
  • Youming Xu
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Dexin Gong
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Ming Xu
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Xun Li
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Yutong Bai
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Rongrong Gong
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • Prateek Sharma
    University of Kansas School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
  • Honggang Yu
    Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

説明

<jats:p> Background Tandem colonoscopy studies have found that about one in five adenomas are missed at colonoscopy. It remains debatable whether the combination of a computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) system with a computer-aided quality improvement (CAQ) system for real-time monitoring of withdrawal speed results in additional benefits in adenoma detection or if the synergetic effect may be harmed due to excessive visual burden resulting from information overload. This study aimed to evaluate the interaction effect on improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR).</jats:p><jats:p> Methods This single-center, randomized, four-group, parallel, controlled study was performed at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. Between 1 July and 15 October 2020, 1076 patients were randomly allocated into four treatment groups: control 271, CADe 268, CAQ 269, and CADe plus CAQ (COMBO) 268. The primary outcome was ADR.</jats:p><jats:p> Results The ADR in the control, CADe, CAQ, and COMBO groups was 14.76 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 10.54 to 18.98), 21.27 % (95 %CI 16.37 to 26.17), 24.54 % (95 %CI 19.39 to 29.68), and 30.60 % (95 %CI 25.08 to 36.11), respectively. The ADR was higher in the COMBO group compared with the CADe group (21.27 % vs. 30.6 %, P = 0.024, odds ratio [OR] 1.284, 95 %CI 1.033 to 1.596) but not compared with the CAQ group (24.54 % vs. 30.6 %, P = 0.213, OR 1.309, 95 %CI 0.857 to 2.000, respectively).</jats:p><jats:p> Conclusions CAQ significantly improved the efficacy of CADe in a four-group, parallel, controlled study. No significant difference in the ADR or polyp detection rate was found between CAQ and COMBO.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Endoscopy

    Endoscopy 54 (08), 757-768, 2021-11-25

    Georg Thieme Verlag KG

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ