European Association for Osseointegration Delphi study on the trends in Implant Dentistry in Europe for the year 2030
-
- Mariano Sanz
- ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology University Complutense of Madrid Madrid Spain
-
- Blas Noguerol
- Clinica Noguerol Granada Spain
-
- Ignacio Sanz‐Sanchez
- ETEP Research Group, Faculty of Odontology University Complutense of Madrid Madrid Spain
-
- Christoph H. F. Hammerle
- Clinic of Fixed & Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science Zurich Switzerland
-
- Henning Schliephake
- OMF Surgery George‐Augusta‐University Göttingen Germany
-
- Frank Renouard
- Cabinet RENOUARD Paris France
-
- Alberto Sicilia
- Universidad de Oviedo, Section of Periodontology University Clinic of Dentistry Oviedo Spain
-
- Luca Cordaro
- Eastman Dental Hospital University Policlinic Umberto I Rome Rome Italy
-
- Ronald Jung
- Clinic of Fixed & Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science Zurich Switzerland
-
- Bjorn Klinge
- Dental Medicine Karolinska Institutet Solna Sweden
-
- Pascal Valentini
- Université de Corse Pascal Paoli Corte France
-
- Gil Alcoforado
- Department of Periodontology University of Lisbon Lisbon Portugal
-
- Turker Ornekol
- Cosmodent Center for Dentistry and Dental Implants Istanbul Turkey
-
- Bjarni Pjetursson
- Department of Reconstructive Dentistry University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland
-
- Irena Sailer
- Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
-
- Isabella Rochietta
- The London Center for Implant and Aesthetic Dentistry London UK
-
- José Manuel Navarro
- Brånemark Osseointegration Center Las Palmas Spain
-
- Lisa Heitz‐Mayfield
- The University of Western Australia Crawley Western Australia Australia
-
- Helena Francisco
- University of Lisbon School of Dental Medicine Lisbon Portugal
抄録
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To assess the potential trends for the year 2030 in dental implant dentistry in Europe using the Delphi methodology.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Material and methods</jats:title><jats:p>A steering committee and a management team of experts in implant dentistry were created and validated a questionnaire including 60 questions, divided in eight topics. The survey was conducted in two rounds using an anonymous questionnaire, which provided the participants in the second round with the results of the first. Each question had three possible answers, and the results were expressed as percentages.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>A total of 138 experts were invited to participate in the survey. From all the invited experts, 52 answered in both the first and second rounds. Three different consensus categories were established based on the percentage of agreement: no consensus (<65%); moderate consensus (65%–85%); and high consensus (≥86%). Within the topic categories, a consensus was reached (mainly moderate consensus) for the majority of questions discussed among experts during a face to face consensus meeting. However, consensus was not reached for a small number of questions/topics.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>About 82% of the questions reached consensus. The consensus points towards a lower number of implants to replace chewing units, with implants surfaces made of bioactive materials with reduced micro‐roughness using mainly customized abutments with polished surfaces and an internal implant–abutment connection (85%). CBCT‐3D technologies will be the main tool for pre‐surgical implant placement diagnosis together with direct digital restorative workflows. There will be an increase in the incidence of peri‐implantitis, although there will be more efficient interventions its treatment and prevention.</jats:p></jats:sec>
収録刊行物
-
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
-
Clinical Oral Implants Research 30 (5), 476-486, 2019-04-29
Wiley