Remote sensing of surface energy fluxes at 10<sup>1</sup>‐m pixel resolutions

  • J. M. Norman
    Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA
  • M. C. Anderson
    Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA
  • W. P. Kustas
    USDA‐ARS, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab Beltsville Maryland USA
  • A. N. French
    USDA‐ARS, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab Beltsville Maryland USA
  • J. Mecikalski
    Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA
  • R. Torn
    Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA
  • G. R. Diak
    Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA
  • T. J. Schmugge
    USDA‐ARS, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab Beltsville Maryland USA
  • B. C. W. Tanner
    Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA

Bibliographic Information

Published
2003-08
Rights Information
  • http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
DOI
  • 10.1029/2002wr001775
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Search this article

Description

<jats:p>Many applications exist within the fields of agriculture, forestry, land management, and hydrologic assessment for routine estimation of surface energy fluxes, particularly evapotranspiration (ET), at spatial resolutions of the order of 10<jats:sup>1</jats:sup> m. A new two‐step approach (called the disaggregated atmosphere land exchange inverse model, or DisALEXI) has been developed to combine low‐ and high‐resolution remote sensing data to estimate ET on the 10<jats:sup>1</jats:sup>–10<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> m scale without requiring any local observations. The first step uses surface brightness‐temperature‐change measurements made over a 4‐hour morning interval from the GOES satellite to estimate average surface fluxes on the scale of about 5 km with an algorithm known as ALEXI. The second step disaggregates the GOES 5‐km surface flux estimates by using high‐spatial‐resolution images of vegetation index and surface temperature, such as from ASTER, Landsat, MODIS, or aircraft, to produce high‐spatial‐resolution maps of surface fluxes. Using data from the Southern Great Plains field experiment of 1997, the root‐mean‐square difference between remote estimates of surface fluxes and ground‐based measurements is about 40 W m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>, comparable to uncertainties associated with micrometeorological surface flux measurement techniques. The DisALEXI approach was useful for estimating field‐scale, surface energy fluxes in a heterogeneous area of central Oklahoma without using any local observations, thus providing a means for scaling kilometer‐scale flux estimates down to a surface flux‐tower footprint. Although the DisALEXI approach is promising for general applicability, further tests with varying surface conditions are necessary to establish greater confidence.</jats:p>

Journal

Citations (1)*help

See more

Report a problem

Back to top