Transcription factor Nrf2 mediates an adaptive response to sulforaphane that protects fibroblasts in vitro against the cytotoxic effects of electrophiles, peroxides and redox-cycling agents
書誌事項
- 公開日
- 2009-06
- 資源種別
- journal article
- 権利情報
-
- https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/
- DOI
-
- 10.1016/j.taap.2009.03.005
- 公開者
- Elsevier BV
この論文をさがす
説明
Sulforaphane can stimulate cellular adaptation to redox stressors through transcription factor Nrf2. Using mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) as a model, we show herein that the normal homeostatic level of glutathione in Nrf2(-/-) MEFs was only 20% of that in their wild-type counterparts. Furthermore, the rate of glutathione synthesis following its acute depletion upon treatment with 3 micromol/l sulforaphane was very substantially lower in Nrf2(-/-) MEFs than in wild-type cells, and the rebound leading to a approximately 1.9-fold increase in glutathione that occurred 12-24 h after Nrf2(+/+) MEFs were treated with sulforaphane was not observed in Nrf2(-/-) fibroblasts. Wild-type MEFs that had been pre-treated for 24 h with 3 micromol/l sulforaphane exhibited between 1.4- and 3.2-fold resistance against thiol-reactive electrophiles, including isothiocyanates, alpha,beta-unsaturated carbonyl compounds (e.g. acrolein), aryl halides and alkene epoxides. Pre-treatment of Nrf2(+/+) MEFs with sulforaphane also protected against hydroperoxides (e.g. cumene hydroperoxide, CuOOH), free radical-generating compounds (e.g. menadione), and genotoxic electrophiles (e.g. chlorambucil). By contrast, Nrf2(-/-) MEFs were typically approximately 50% less tolerant of these agents than wild-type fibroblasts, and sulforaphane pre-treatment did not protect the mutant cells against xenobiotics. To test whether Nrf2-mediated up-regulation of glutathione represents the major cytoprotective mechanism stimulated by sulforaphane, 5 micromol/l buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) was used to inhibit glutathione synthesis. In Nrf2(+/+) MEFs pre-treated with sulforaphane, BSO diminished intrinsic resistance and abolished inducible resistance to acrolein, CuOOH and chlorambucil, but not menadione. Thus Nrf2-dependent up-regulation of GSH is the principal mechanism by which sulforaphane pre-treatment induced resistance to acrolein, CuOOH and chlorambucil, but not menadione.
収録刊行物
-
- Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
-
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 237 (3), 267-280, 2009-06
Elsevier BV
- Tweet
キーワード
- INDUCIBLE EXPRESSION
- Glutathione S-transferases
- Male
- Free Radicals
- NF-E2-Related Factor 2
- Menadione
- DEFICIENT MICE
- Xenobiotics
- Mice
- Isothiocyanates
- ACETAMINOPHEN HEPATOTOXICITY
- Animals
- OXIDATIVE STRESS
- Acrolein
- Cells, Cultured
- GENE-EXPRESSION
- DRUG-RESISTANCE
- Mice, Knockout
- 500
- Fibroblasts
- Adaptation, Physiological
- Glutathione
- Peroxides
- Mice, Inbred C57BL
- Cancer chemoprevention
- Sulfoxides
- Chlorambucil
- REACTIVE OXYGEN
- OLIGONUCLEOTIDE MICROARRAY
- Oxidation-Reduction
- CHEMOPREVENTIVE ISOTHIOCYANATE
- Thiocyanates
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360565166126078592
-
- ISSN
- 0041008X
-
- PubMed
- 19303893
-
- 資料種別
- journal article
-
- データソース種別
-
- Crossref
- KAKEN
- OpenAIRE
