Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: A multimodel evaluation
-
- F. Dentener
- European Commission Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre Ispra Italy
-
- J. Drevet
- Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland
-
- J. F. Lamarque
- Atmospheric Chemistry Division National Center of Atmospheric Research Boulder Colorado USA
-
- I. Bey
- Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL) Lausanne Switzerland
-
- B. Eickhout
- Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (RIVM) Bilthoven Netherlands
-
- A. M. Fiore
- Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory NOAA Princeton New Jersey USA
-
- D. Hauglustaine
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement CEA/CNRS Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
-
- L. W. Horowitz
- Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory NOAA Princeton New Jersey USA
-
- M. Krol
- European Commission Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre Ispra Italy
-
- U. C. Kulshrestha
- Analytical and Environmental Chemistry Division Indian Institute of Chemical Technology Hyderabad India
-
- M. Lawrence
- Max Planck Institute for Chemistry Mainz Germany
-
- C. Galy‐Lacaux
- Laboratoire d'Aérologie Observatoire Midi‐Pyrénées Toulouse France
-
- S. Rast
- Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Hamburg Germany
-
- D. Shindell
- NASA‐Goddard Institute for Space Studies New York USA
-
- D. Stevenson
- School of Geosciences, Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Science University of Edinburgh UK
-
- T. Van Noije
- Atmospheric Composition, Climate Research and Seismology Department Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) De Bilt Netherlands
-
- C. Atherton
- Atmospheric Science Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore California USA
-
- N. Bell
- NASA‐Goddard Institute for Space Studies New York USA
-
- D. Bergman
- Atmospheric Science Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore California USA
-
- T. Butler
- Max Planck Institute for Chemistry Mainz Germany
-
- J. Cofala
- International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg Austria
-
- B. Collins
- Met Office Exeter UK
-
- R. Doherty
- School of Geosciences, Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Science University of Edinburgh UK
-
- K. Ellingsen
- Department of Geosciences University of Oslo Oslo Norway
-
- J. Galloway
- Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA
-
- M. Gauss
- Department of Geosciences University of Oslo Oslo Norway
-
- V. Montanaro
- Dipartimento di Fisica Università L'Aquila Aquila Italy
-
- J. F. Müller
- Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy Brussels Belgium
-
- G. Pitari
- Dipartimento di Fisica Università L'Aquila Aquila Italy
-
- J. Rodriguez
- Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center (GEST) Baltimore Maryland USA
-
- M. Sanderson
- Met Office Exeter UK
-
- F. Solmon
- Laboratoire d'Aérologie Observatoire Midi‐Pyrénées Toulouse France
-
- S. Strahan
- Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center (GEST) Baltimore Maryland USA
-
- M. Schultz
- Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Hamburg Germany
-
- K. Sudo
- Atmospheric Composition Research Program Frontier Research Center for Global Change (JAMSTEC) Yokohama Japan
-
- S. Szopa
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement CEA/CNRS Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
-
- O. Wild
- Atmospheric Composition Research Program Frontier Research Center for Global Change (JAMSTEC) Yokohama Japan
書誌事項
- 公開日
- 2006-10-28
- 権利情報
-
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
- DOI
-
- 10.1029/2005gb002672
- 10.7916/d8z60npm
- 公開者
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:p>We use 23 atmospheric chemistry transport models to calculate current and future (2030) deposition of reactive nitrogen (NO<jats:sub>y</jats:sub>, NH<jats:sub>x</jats:sub>) and sulfate (SO<jats:sub>x</jats:sub>) to land and ocean surfaces. The models are driven by three emission scenarios: (1) current air quality legislation (CLE); (2) an optimistic case of the maximum emissions reductions currently technologically feasible (MFR); and (3) the contrasting pessimistic IPCC SRES A2 scenario. An extensive evaluation of the present‐day deposition using nearly all information on wet deposition available worldwide shows a good agreement with observations in Europe and North America, where 60–70% of the model‐calculated wet deposition rates agree to within ±50% with quality‐controlled measurements. Models systematically overestimate NH<jats:sub>x</jats:sub> deposition in South Asia, and underestimate NO<jats:sub>y</jats:sub> deposition in East Asia. We show that there are substantial differences among models for the removal mechanisms of NO<jats:sub>y</jats:sub>, NH<jats:sub>x</jats:sub>, and SO<jats:sub>x</jats:sub>, leading to ±1 <jats:italic>σ</jats:italic> variance in total deposition fluxes of about 30% in the anthropogenic emissions regions, and up to a factor of 2 outside. In all cases the mean model constructed from the ensemble calculations is among the best when comparing to measurements. Currently, 36–51% of all NO<jats:sub>y</jats:sub>, NH<jats:sub>x</jats:sub>, and SO<jats:sub>x</jats:sub> is deposited over the ocean, and 50–80% of the fraction of deposition on land falls on natural (nonagricultural) vegetation. Currently, 11% of the world's natural vegetation receives nitrogen deposition in excess of the “critical load” threshold of 1000 mg(N) m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> yr<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. The regions most affected are the United States (20% of vegetation), western Europe (30%), eastern Europe (80%), South Asia (60%), East Asia (40%), southeast Asia (30%), and Japan (50%). Future deposition fluxes are mainly driven by changes in emissions, and less importantly by changes in atmospheric chemistry and climate. The global fraction of vegetation exposed to nitrogen loads in excess of 1000 mg(N) m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> yr<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> increases globally to 17% for CLE and 25% for A2. In MFR, the reductions in NO<jats:sub>y</jats:sub> are offset by further increases for NH<jats:sub>x</jats:sub> deposition. The regions most affected by exceedingly high nitrogen loads for CLE and A2 are Europe and Asia, but also parts of Africa.</jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Global Biogeochemical Cycles
-
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 20 (4), GB4003-, 2006-10-28
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Tweet
キーワード
- future
- Atmospheric chemistry
- 550
- ammonia
- [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH] Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph]
- Sulfur deposits
- Tropospheric chemistry--Mathematical models
- nitrogen cycle
- biodiversity hotspots
- [PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-AO-PH]Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics [physics.ao-ph]
- tropospheric ozone
- model
- info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/550
- cycle
- emissions
- modeling
- FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences
- Climatic changes
- J
- Geochemistry
- aerocom
- nitrogen cycle.
- ecosystems
- europe
- aerosols
- Nitrogen oxides
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360574092892034432
-
- ISSN
- 19449224
- 08866236
-
- データソース種別
-
- Crossref
- OpenAIRE