Behavioural synchronization of large‐scale animal movements – disperse alone, but migrate together?
-
- Julien Cote
- ENFA and UMR 5174 EDB (Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique), CNRS Université Toulouse III – Paul Sabatier Toulouse cedex 9 F‐31062 France
-
- Greta Bocedi
- Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen AB24 2TZ UK
-
- Lucie Debeffe
- CEFS, INRA Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan 31320 France
-
- Magda E. Chudzińska
- Department of Bioscience Aarhus University Roskilde 4000 Denmark
-
- Helene C. Weigang
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Helsinki P.O. Box 68 Helsinki 00014 Finland
-
- Calvin Dytham
- Department of Biology University of York York YO10 5DD UK
-
- Georges Gonzalez
- CEFS, INRA Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan 31320 France
-
- Erik Matthysen
- Department of Biology University of Antwerp Antwerp B‐2610 Belgium
-
- Justin Travis
- Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen AB24 2TZ UK
-
- Michel Baguette
- Station d'Ecologie Théorique et Experimentale CNRS UMR 5321 Moulis 09200 France
-
- A. J. Mark Hewison
- CEFS, INRA Université de Toulouse Castanet Tolosan 31320 France
書誌事項
- 公開日
- 2016-05-06
- 権利情報
-
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
- DOI
-
- 10.1111/brv.12279
- 公開者
- Wiley
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>Dispersal and migration are superficially similar large‐scale movements, but which appear to differ in terms of inter‐individual behavioural synchronization. Seasonal migration is a striking example of coordinated behaviour, enabling animal populations to track spatio‐temporal variation in ecological conditions. By contrast, for dispersal, while social context may influence an individual's emigration and settlement decisions, transience is believed to be mostly a solitary behaviour. Here, we review differences in drivers that may explain why migration appears to be more synchronized than dispersal. We derive the prediction that the contrast in the importance of behavioural synchronization between dispersal and migration is linked to differences in the selection pressures that drive their respective evolution. Although documented examples of collective dispersal are rare, this behaviour may be more common than currently believed, with important consequences for eco‐evolutionary dynamics. Crucially, to date, there is little available theory for predicting when we should expect collective dispersal to evolve, and we also lack empirical data to test predictions across species. By reviewing the state of the art in research on migration and collective movements, we identify how we can harness these advances, both in terms of theory and data collection, to broaden our understanding of synchronized dispersal and its importance in the context of global change.</jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Biological Reviews
-
Biological Reviews 92 (3), 1275-1296, 2016-05-06
Wiley