Assessment of Upper-Limb Sensorimotor Function of Subacute Stroke Patients Using Visually Guided Reaching
-
- Angela M. Coderre
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
-
- Amr Abou Zeid
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
-
- Sean P. Dukelow
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
-
- Melanie J. Demmer
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
-
- Kimberly D. Moore
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
-
- Mary Jo Demers
- Providence Care, St Mary's of the Lake Hospital Site, Kingston
-
- Helen Bretzke
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
-
- Troy M. Herter
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
-
- Janice I. Glasgow
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
-
- Kathleen E. Norman
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
-
- Stephen D. Bagg
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, Providence Care, St Mary's of the Lake Hospital Site, Kingston,ON, Canada
-
- Stephen H. Scott
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada,
書誌事項
- 公開日
- 2010-03-16
- 権利情報
-
- https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license
- DOI
-
- 10.1177/1545968309356091
- 公開者
- SAGE Publications
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:p> Objective. Using robotic technology, we examined the ability of a visually guided reaching task to assess the sensorimotor function of patients with stroke. Methods. Ninety-one healthy participants and 52 with subacute stroke of mild to moderate severity (26 with left- and 26 with right-affected body sides) performed an unassisted reaching task using the KINARM robot. Each participant was assessed using 12 movement parameters that were grouped into 5 attributes of sensorimotor control. Results. A number of movement parameters individually identified a large number of stroke participants as being different from 95% of the controls—most notably initial direction error, which identified 81% of left-affected patients. We also found interlimb differences in performance between the arms of those with stroke compared with controls. For example, whereas only 31% of left-affected participants showed differences in reaction time with their affected arm, 54% showed abnormal interlimb differences in reaction time. Good interrater reliability ( r > 0.7) was observed for 9 of the 12 movement parameters. Finally, many stroke patients deemed impaired on the reaching task had been scored 6 or less on the arm portion of the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment Scale, but some who scored a normal 7 were also deemed impaired in reaching. Conclusions. Robotic technology using a visually guided reaching task can provide reliable information with greater sensitivity about a patient’s sensorimotor impairments following stroke than a standard clinical assessment scale. </jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
-
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 24 (6), 528-541, 2010-03-16
SAGE Publications