- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Automatic Translation feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Early clinical outcomes of simple pannus removal for mechanical aortic valve stenosis
Description
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>This study aimed to confirm the safety and feasibility of simple pannus removal in patients with mechanical aortic valve dysfunction for pannus overgrowth by evaluating its early clinical outcomes.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>From March 2015 to April 2019, 24 consecutive patients with mechanical aortic valve dysfunction due to subaortic pannus underwent reoperation. In 12 patients the repeat aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed, and 12 received the simple pannus removal to preserve the previously implanted prosthesis.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>There was only 1 in-hospital death in simple pannus removal group. Significant differences were obtained between procedures in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp time (128.7 vs 179.7 and 74.2 vs 132.7 mins, respectively, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.05). The C-reactive protein (CRP) in simple pannus removal group was lower on the first day (0.13 ± 0.09 vs 0.31 ± 0.22 mg/dl, P < 0.05) and continued to be lower within 1 week after operation. There was no significant difference between procedures in aortic transvalvular peak velocity and transvalvular mean pressure gradient (TMPG) (2.6 ± 0.4 vs 2.5 ± 0.4 m/s and 13.2 ± 3.6 vs 11.6 ± 2.6 mmHg, respectively, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> > 0.05) in echocardiography 1 week after operation. In addition, the aortic transvalvular peak velocity and TMPG in echocardiography 1 week after operation in pannus removal group between the repeat and initial surgery were not statistically significant (2.6 ± 0.4 vs. 2.5 ± 0.3 m/s, 13.2 ± 3.6 vs. 13.0 ± 3.5 mmHg, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> > 0.05).</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Simple pannus removal was a safe and effective procedure with satisfied early clinical outcomes for pannus overgrowth in mechanical aortic valve. However, further randomized and long-term follow-up studies were warranted to determine the clinical effects of the simple aortic pannus removal.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
Journal
-
- Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
-
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 14 (1), 2019-11-27
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360574094959285376
-
- ISSN
- 17498090
-
- Data Source
-
- Crossref