A Critical Appraisal of the Electrocardiographic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

  • DONALD W. ROMHILT
    From the Cardiac Laboratory, Cincinnati General Hospital, and the Departments of Internal Medicine and Pathology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • KEVIN E. BOVE
    From the Cardiac Laboratory, Cincinnati General Hospital, and the Departments of Internal Medicine and Pathology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • ROBERT J. NORRIS
    From the Cardiac Laboratory, Cincinnati General Hospital, and the Departments of Internal Medicine and Pathology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • EMMETT CONYERS
    From the Cardiac Laboratory, Cincinnati General Hospital, and the Departments of Internal Medicine and Pathology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • SANDRA CONRADI
    From the Cardiac Laboratory, Cincinnati General Hospital, and the Departments of Internal Medicine and Pathology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • DAVID T. ROWLANDS
    From the Cardiac Laboratory, Cincinnati General Hospital, and the Departments of Internal Medicine and Pathology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • RALPH C. SCOTT
    From the Cardiac Laboratory, Cincinnati General Hospital, and the Departments of Internal Medicine and Pathology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

書誌事項

公開日
1969-08
DOI
  • 10.1161/01.cir.40.2.185
公開者
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:p>Thirty-three different electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy have been evaluated in 360 autopsied hearts utilizing a chamber dissection technic. One hundred and sixty hearts had left ventricular hypertrophy, and 200 hearts did not (146 of these were normal, and 54 had right ventricular hypertrophy).</jats:p> <jats:p> The following five electrocardiographic criteria had a sensitivity of 56% but 10.5% to 14.5% false positives: S <jats:sub>v1</jats:sub> or S <jats:sub>v2</jats:sub> +R <jats:sub>v5</jats:sub> ≥35 mm, S <jats:sub>v1</jats:sub> +R <jats:sub>v5</jats:sub> or R <jats:sub>v6</jats:sub> >30 mm, S <jats:sub>v1</jats:sub> , or S <jats:sub>v2</jats:sub> + R <jats:sub>v5</jats:sub> or R <jats:sub>v6</jats:sub> >35 mm, S <jats:sub>v2</jats:sub> +R <jats:sub>v4</jats:sub> or R <jats:sub>v5</jats:sub> >35 mm, R+S>40 mm. A point-score system employing a combination of criteria had a sensitivity of 54%, but lowered the false positives to 3%. The best limb-lead criterion was R aV <jats:sub>L</jats:sub> >7.5 which had a sensitivity of 22.5% with only 3.5% false positives. The following criteria had no false positives, but the highest sensitivity was 19%: S <jats:sub>v1</jats:sub> ≥24 mm, R aV <jats:sub>L</jats:sub> >11 mm, R <jats:sub>I</jats:sub> +S <jats:sub>III</jats:sub> >25 mm, R <jats:sub>I</jats:sub> >13 mm, R aV <jats:sub>L</jats:sub> >12 mm, R <jats:sub>I</jats:sub> >15 mm, R aV <jats:sub>L</jats:sub> >13 mm, and S aV <jats:sub>R</jats:sub> >14 mm. Overall the precordial lead criteria were considerably more sensitive but less specific than the limb lead criteria. Since only six of the 200 hearts without left ventricular hypertrophy were in persons less than 30 years of age, this is not the major explanation for the high incidence of false positives in the more sensitive voltage criteria. The problems of using voltage criteria alone and the need for new criteria and approaches to the electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy are discussed. </jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Circulation

    Circulation 40 (2), 185-196, 1969-08

    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

被引用文献 (3)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ