Cross‐cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of the Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire
-
- Emmanuel Navarro‐Flores
- Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Department of Nursing, Frailty Research Organizaded Group (FROG) University of Valencia Spain
-
- Marta Elena Losa‐Iglesias
- Faculty of Health Sciences Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Spain
-
- Ricardo Becerro‐de‐Bengoa‐Vallejo
- School of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry Universidad Complutense de Madrid Spain
-
- María Reina‐Bueno
- Department of Podiatry, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry Universidad de Sevilla Spain
-
- Daniel López‐López
- Research, Health and Podiatry Group, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry Universidade da Coruña Spain
-
- Carlos Romero‐Morales
- Faculty Sports Sciences Universidad Europea de Madrid Madrid Spain
-
- Patricia Palomo‐López
- University Center of Plasencia Universidad de Extremadura Spain
-
- César Calvo‐Lobo
- School of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry Universidad Complutense de Madrid Spain
抄録
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire (FAOS‐S) may be considered a health evaluation tool with 42 questions for assessing foot health disorders. To date, FAOS has been validated in different languages, but a Spanish version was lacking. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to translate and validate the Spanish version of the FAOS (FAOS es). A suitable method was developed for the translation protocol and cross‐cultural validation from Swedish to Spanish. Regarding the total marks from each domain, agreement degrees and confidence were analysed using the Cronbach's <jats:italic>α</jats:italic> and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. In addition, the mean ± SD differences between pretest and posttests were calculated and completed using of the Bland and Altman distribution plots. Excellent agreement between the two versions based on Cronbach's <jats:italic>α</jats:italic> was demonstrated. Five domains consisting of pain, symptoms of foot disorders, activities of daily living, sports and recreation, and foot and ankle quality of life were added together to obtain the total score. Excellent retest reliability was shown for the total score. Test/retest reliability was excellent for the pain, stiffness, other foot disorder‐related symptoms, and quality of life domains. There were no significant differences among any domain (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> > .05). There were no statistically significant differences (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .000) for the mean ± SD differences between pretest and posttests (56.2524 ± 19.064 [51.98–60.52] and 57.45 ± 21.02 [52.74–62.16] points, respectively). Bland and Altman plots or clinically pertinent variations were not statistically significantly different. The FAOS is considered a strong and valid questionnaire with adequate repeatability in the Spanish community.</jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- International Wound Journal
-
International Wound Journal 17 (5), 1384-1390, 2020-05-27
Wiley
- Tweet
キーワード
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360576122393994624
-
- ISSN
- 1742481X
- 17424801
-
- データソース種別
-
- Crossref