Impact of timing of dental implant placement and loading: Summary and consensus statements of group 1—The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021
-
- Nikos Donos
- Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University of London (QMUL London UK
-
- Nele Van Asche
- Centre for Periodontology and Oral Implants KULeuven Leuven Belgium
-
- Aron Naim Akbar
- Health Technology Assessment‐Odontology (HTA‐O) Malmö University Malmö Sweden
-
- Helena Francisco
- Departamento de Cirurgia Oral e Implantologia Faculdade de Medicina Dentária Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
-
- Oscar Gonzales
- Department of Periodontology Complutense University of Madrid Madrid Spain
-
- Klaus Gotfredsen
- Oral Rehabilitation Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark
-
- Robert Haas
- Academy for Oral Implantology Vienna Austria
-
- Arndt Happe
- Department of Prosthetic Dentistry University Ulm Center of Dentistry Germany and Private Practice Münster Germany
-
- Natalie Leow
- Periodontology Unit UCL‐Eastman Dental Institute London UK
-
- Jose Manuel Navarro
- Private Practice Harley Street London UK
-
- Turker Ornekol
- Cosmodent Center for Dentistry and Dental Implants Istanbul Turkey
-
- Michael Payer
- Department of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics University Clinic of Dental Medicine & Oral Health Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
-
- Franck Renouard
- Private Practice Paris France
-
- Henning Schliephake
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery University Medicine‐Augusta‐University Göttingen Germany
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>This publication reports on the EAO workshop group 1 summaries, discussions and consensus statements based on four systematic reviews evaluating the impact of timing of dental implant placement and loading.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and methods</jats:title><jats:p>The first of the systematic reviews was on the influence of the timing of implant placement and loading in the biological outcomes of implant‐supported fixed partial dentures. The second systematic review evaluated the influence of the timing of implant placement and loading on the aesthetic outcomes in single‐tooth implants. The third systematic review was on the long‐term outcomes of maxillary single‐tooth implants in relation to timing protocols of implant placement and loading and the fourth on patient's perception of timing concepts in implant dentistry. The group evaluated these systematic reviews, provided comments and additions as required and agreed on the relevant consensus statements as well as on clinical and research recommendations.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Different timings of implant placement/loading presented with high implant survival rates. The systematic reviews evaluated from this working group provided a number of conclusions based on the available/current literature. However, the specific topic of timing is an area that further research is required in order to provide detailed guidelines for the different protocols to be employed.</jats:p></jats:sec>
Journal
-
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
-
Clinical Oral Implants Research 32 (S21), 85-92, 2021-10
Wiley
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360576217656597888
-
- ISSN
- 16000501
- 09057161
-
- Data Source
-
- Crossref