Work Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model
-
- Greta Mazzetti
- Department of Education Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
-
- Enrique Robledo
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain
-
- Michela Vignoli
- Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
-
- Gabriela Topa
- Department of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain
-
- Dina Guglielmi
- Department of Education Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
-
- Wilmar B Schaufeli
- Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; and Research Unit Occupational, Organizational Psychology and Professional Learning, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
Description
<jats:p> Although the construct of work engagement has been extensively explored, a systematic meta-analysis based on a consistent categorization of engagement antecedents, outcomes, and well-being correlates is still lacking. The results of prior research reporting 533 correlations from 113 independent samples ( k = 94, n = 119,420) were coded using a meta-analytic approach. The effect size for development resources ( r = .45) and personal resources ( r = .48) was higher than for social resources ( r = .36) and for job resources ( r = .37). Among the outcomes and well-being correlates explored, the effect size was highest for job satisfaction ( r = .60) and commitment ( r = .63). Furthermore, moderation analysis showed that (a) concerning the occupational role, work engagement finds a low association with turnover intention among civil servants, volunteer workers, and educators; (b) collectivist cultural environments reported a greater association of feedback with engagement than individualistic environments; (c) the relationship between personal resources and engagement was stronger among workers with university degrees than workers with high school diplomas. Furthermore, the absorption dimension showed a lower effect with all variables under investigation than vigor and dedication. </jats:p>
Journal
-
- Psychological Reports
-
Psychological Reports 126 (3), 1069-1107, 2021-12-10
SAGE Publications
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360579816414204800
-
- ISSN
- 1558691X
- 00332941
-
- Data Source
-
- Crossref