The effect of implant‐abutment junction position on crestal bone loss: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

  • Muhammad H. A. Saleh
    Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine University of Michigan School of Dentistry Ann Arbor Michigan
  • Andrea Ravidà
    Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine University of Michigan School of Dentistry Ann Arbor Michigan
  • Fernando Suárez‐López del Amo
    Department of Periodontics University of Oklahoma, College of Dentistry Norman Oklahoma
  • Guo‐Hao Lin
    Department of Orofacial Sciences University of California San Francisco California
  • Farah Asa'ad
    Department of Biomedical, Surgical & Dental Sciences University of Milan Milan Italy
  • Hom‐Lay Wang
    Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine University of Michigan School of Dentistry Ann Arbor Michigan

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>To investigate the effect of the apico‐coronal implant position on early and late crestal bone loss (CBL), in bone and tissue level implants.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and methods</jats:title><jats:p>Electronic and manual literature searches were conducted for controlled clinical trials reporting on CBL before and after functional loading of implants. Random effects meta‐analyses were applied to analyze the weighted mean difference (WMD) and meta‐regression was conducted to investigate any potential influences of select confounding factors.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Fourteen articles were included in the systematic review and 12 were included in the quantitative synthesis. For bone level implants, WMD comparing <jats:italic>early</jats:italic> CBL in equi and subcrestal placement was 0.15 mm (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .18). For analyses of <jats:italic>late</jats:italic> CBL in bone level implants, equi and subcrestal placement revealed a 0.03 mm WMD (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .88). Where in supra and subcrestal placement, WMD was 0.04 mm (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .86). The comparison presented considerable heterogeneity between these two arms, where the <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> value for chi‐square test presented as .006. Finally, for CBL between supra and equicrestal placement, WMD was −0.64 mm (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < .0001), favoring the supracrestal group. For tissue level implants, WM of early and late CBL in implants placed equi‐crestally was 0.68 ± 0.12 mm and 0.69 ± 0.54 mm, respectively, where for implants placed sub‐crestally, the WM of CBL was 1.72 ± 0.15 mm and 2.26 ± 0.63 mm, respectively.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Within the limitations of this study, it is recommended to place tissue level implants equicrestally, and bone level implants subcrestally.</jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ