Influence of muscle depth and thickness on ultrasound echo intensity of the vastus lateralis

  • Alyssa N Varanoske
    Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, Division of Kinesiology, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
  • Nicholas A Coker
    Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, Division of Kinesiology, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
  • Bri-Ana DI Johnson
    Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, Division of Kinesiology, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
  • Tal Belity
    Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, Division of Kinesiology, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
  • Adam J Wells
    Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, Division of Kinesiology, College of Health Professions and Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

抄録

<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> Ultrasonography is used to evaluate muscle quality (i.e. echo intensity [EI]), but an attenuation of ultrasound waves occurs in deeper tissues, potentially affecting these measures. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p> To determine whether muscle thickness (MT) affects EI and if EI varies between the superficial and deep portions of the muscle. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and Methods</jats:title><jats:p> MT, EI, subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness (SAT), tissue depth (DIS<jats:sub>DEEP</jats:sub>), and EI of the overall (EI<jats:sub>FULL</jats:sub>) as well as deep (EI<jats:sub>DEEP</jats:sub>) and superficial (EI<jats:sub>SUPF</jats:sub>) portions of the vastus lateralis (VL) were assessed in 33 resistance-trained males using ultrasonography. The difference (EI<jats:sub>DIFF</jats:sub>) between EI<jats:sub>SUPF</jats:sub> and EI<jats:sub>DEEP</jats:sub> was calculated. Mean differences between EI<jats:sub>FULL</jats:sub>, EI<jats:sub>SUPF,</jats:sub> and EI<jats:sub>DEEP</jats:sub> were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Relationships between measures of muscle depth/ thickness and EI were examined using Pearson’s r. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> EI<jats:sub>SUPF</jats:sub> was greater than EI<jats:sub>DEEP</jats:sub> ( P < 0.001) and EI<jats:sub>FULL</jats:sub> ( P < 0.001). MT was negatively correlated with EI<jats:sub>FULL</jats:sub> ( P < 0.001) and positively correlated with EI<jats:sub>DIFF</jats:sub> ( P < 0.001). SAT was not correlated with any EI measure, but DIS<jats:sub>DEEP</jats:sub> was positively correlated with EI<jats:sub>DIFF</jats:sub> ( P < 0.001). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> EI of the VL is heterogeneous, as the deeper portion produces lower values than the superficial portion. Thicker muscles present lower EI but have greater discrepancies in EI between the superficial and deep portions. Although SAT was not correlated with EI, DIS<jats:sub>DEEP</jats:sub> was related to EI<jats:sub>DIFF</jats:sub>, demonstrating that the combination of MT and SAT should be considered when evaluating muscle quality. Future research is necessary to determine if changes in EI following resistance training are driven by increases in MT. </jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

  • Acta Radiologica

    Acta Radiologica 62 (9), 1178-1187, 2020-09-30

    SAGE Publications

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ