- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Knowledge Graph Search feature is available on CiNii Labs
- 【Updated on June 30, 2025】Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Association of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers with risk of COVID‐19, inflammation level, severity, and death in patients with COVID‐19: A rapid systematic review and meta‐analysis
-
- Xiao Liu
- Department of cardiovascular medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi China
-
- Chuyan Long
- Department of cardiovascular medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi China
-
- Qinmei Xiong
- Department of cardiovascular medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi China
-
- Chen Chen
- Department of cardiovascular medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi China
-
- Jianyong Ma
- Department of cardiovascular medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi China
-
- Yuhao Su
- Department of cardiovascular medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi China
-
- Kui Hong
- Department of cardiovascular medicine The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University Nanchang Jiangxi China
Search this article
Description
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>An association among the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin‐receptor blockers (ARBs) with the clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is unclear. PubMed, EMBASE, MedRxiv, and BioRxiv were searched for relevant studies that assessed the association between application of ACEI/ARB and risk of COVID‐19, inflammation level, severity COVID‐19 infection, and death in patients with COVID‐19. Ten studies were included with 13,944 patients. ACEI/ARB therapy might be associated with the reduced inflammatory factor (interleukin‐6) and elevated immune cells counts (CD3, CD8). Meta‐analysis showed no significant increase in the risk of COVID‐19 infection (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.89‐1.05) in patients receiving ACEI/ARB therapy, and ACEI/ARB therapy was associated with a decreased risk of severe COVID‐19 (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.59‐0.96, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.02) and mortality (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37‐0.87, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.009). Subgroup analyses showed among the general population, ACEI/ARB therapy was not associated with reduced risks of severe COVID‐19 infection (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.66‐1.08, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.19) and all‐cause mortality (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.13‐0.75), and COVID‐19 infection (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.89‐1.05, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.45) were not increased. Among patients with hypertension, the use of an ACEI/ARB was associated with a non‐significant lower severity of COVID‐19 (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.51‐1.03, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.07) and significant lower mortality (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37‐0.87, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.009), without evidence of an increased risk of COVID‐19 infection (OR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.90‐1.12, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 1.00). On the basis of the available evidence, ACEI/ARB therapy should be continued in patients who are at risk for, or have COVID‐19, either in general population or hypertension patients. Our results need to be interpreted with caution considering the potential for residual confounders, and more well‐designed studies that control the clinical confounders are necessary to confirm our findings.</jats:p>
Journal
-
- Clinical Cardiology
-
Clinical Cardiology 47 (10), 2020-08-05
Wiley
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360580237144287744
-
- ISSN
- 19328737
- 01609289
-
- Data Source
-
- Crossref