Nuclear inclusion bodies of mutant and wild‐type p53 in cancer: a hallmark of p53 inactivation and proteostasis remodelling by p53 aggregation

  • Frederik De Smet
    The Switch Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Mirian Saiz Rubio
    The Switch Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Daphne Hompes
    Department of Abdominal Surgery University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven Belgium
  • Evelyne Naus
    The Switch Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Greet De Baets
    The Switch Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Tobias Langenberg
    The Switch Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Mark S Hipp
    Department of Cellular Biochemistry Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry Martinsried Germany
  • Bert Houben
    The Switch Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Filip Claes
    The Switch Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Sarah Charbonneau
    Department of Medical Oncology Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA
  • Javier Delgado Blanco
    The Switch Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Stephane Plaisance
    Nucleomics Core, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology (VIB) Leuven Belgium
  • Shakti Ramkissoon
    Department of Medical Oncology Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA
  • Lori Ramkissoon
    Department of Medical Oncology Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA
  • Colinda Simons
    Department of Epidemiology – GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
  • Piet van den Brandt
    Department of Epidemiology – GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
  • Matty Weijenberg
    Department of Epidemiology – GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
  • Manon Van England
    Department of Pathology – GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
  • Sandrina Lambrechts
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Frederic Amant
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • André D'Hoore
    Department of Abdominal Surgery University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven Belgium
  • Keith L Ligon
    Department of Medical Oncology Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USA
  • Xavier Sagaert
    Translational Cell and Tissue Research KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Joost Schymkowitz
    The Switch Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
  • Frederic Rousseau
    The Switch Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine KU Leuven Leuven Belgium

抄録

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Although p53 protein aggregates have been observed in cancer cell lines and tumour tissue, their impact in cancer remains largely unknown. Here, we extensively screened for p53 aggregation phenotypes in tumour biopsies, and identified nuclear inclusion bodies (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">nIBs</jats:styled-content>) of transcriptionally inactive mutant or wild‐type p53 as the most frequent aggregation‐like phenotype across six different cancer types. p53‐positive <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">nIBs</jats:styled-content> co‐stained with nuclear aggregation markers, and shared molecular hallmarks of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">nIBs</jats:styled-content> commonly found in neurodegenerative disorders. In cell culture, tumour‐associated stress was a strong inducer of p53 aggregation and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">nIB</jats:styled-content> formation. This was most prominent for mutant p53, but could also be observed in wild‐type p53 cell lines, for which <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">nIB</jats:styled-content> formation correlated with the loss of p53's transcriptional activity. Importantly, protein aggregation also fuelled the dysregulation of the proteostasis network in the tumour cell by inducing a hyperactivated, oncogenic heat‐shock response, to which tumours are commonly addicted, and by overloading the proteasomal degradation system, an observation that was most pronounced for structurally destabilized mutant p53. Patients showing tumours with p53‐positive <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">nIBs</jats:styled-content> suffered from a poor clinical outcome, similar to those with loss of p53 expression, and tumour biopsies showed a differential proteostatic expression profile associated with p53‐positive <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">nIBs</jats:styled-content>. p53‐positive <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">nIBs</jats:styled-content> therefore highlight a malignant state of the tumour that results from the interplay between (1) the functional inactivation of p53 through mutation and/or aggregation, and (2) microenvironmental stress, a combination that catalyses proteostatic dysregulation. This study highlights several unexpected clinical, biological and therapeutically unexplored parallels between cancer and neurodegeneration. Copyright © 2017 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ