Spatial Neglect in Stroke: Identification, Disease Process and Association with Outcome During Inpatient Rehabilitation

  • Ulrike Hammerbeck
    Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Matthew Gittins
    Centre for Biostatistics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Andy Vail
    Centre for Biostatistics, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Lizz Paley
    School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Kings College London, London SE1 1UL, UK
  • Sarah F Tyson
    Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • Audrey Bowen
    Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

説明

<jats:p>We established spatial neglect prevalence, disease profile and amount of therapy that inpatient stroke survivors received, and outcomes at discharge using Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) data. We used data from 88,664 National Health Service (NHS) admissions in England, Wales and Northern Ireland (July 2013–July 2015), for stroke survivors still in hospital after 3 days with a completed baseline neglect National Institute for Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Thirty percent had neglect (NIHSS item 11 ≥ 1) and they were slightly older (78 years) than those without neglect (75 years). Neglect was observed more commonly in women (33 vs. 27%) and in individuals with a premorbid dependency (37 vs. 28%). Survivors of mild stroke were far less likely to present with neglect than those with severe stroke (4% vs. 84%). Those with neglect had a greatly increased length of stay (27 vs. 10 days). They received a comparable amount of average daily occupational and physiotherapy during their longer inpatient stay but on discharge a greater percentage of individuals with neglect were dependent on the modified Rankin scale (76 vs. 57%). Spatial neglect is common and associated with worse clinical outcomes. These results add to our understanding of neglect to inform clinical guidelines, service provision and priorities for future research.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ