Enzalutamide in Japanese patients with chemotherapy‐naïve, metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer: A post‐hoc analysis of the placebo‐controlled PREVAIL trial

  • Go Kimura
    Department of Urology Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan
  • Junji Yonese
    Department of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan
  • Takashi Fukagai
    Department of Urology, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan
  • Tomomi Kamba
    Department of Urology, Kyoto University Hospital Kyoto Japan
  • Kazuo Nishimura
    Department of Urology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases Osaka Japan
  • Masahiro Nozawa
    Department of Urology, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine Higashiosaka City Osaka Japan
  • Hank Mansbach
    Clinical Development, Medivation San Francisco California USA
  • Ad Theeuwes
    Biostatistics, Astellas Pharma Global Development Leiden The Netherlands
  • Tomasz M Beer
    OHSU Knight Cancer Institute Oregon Health and Science University Portland Oregon USA
  • Bertrand Tombal
    Division of Urology Cliniques Universitaires Saint‐Luc Brussels Belgium
  • Takeshi Ueda
    Division of Urology, Chiba Cancer Center Chiba Japan

Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the treatment effects, safety and pharmacokinetics of enzalutamide in Japanese patients.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This was a post‐hoc analysis of the phase 3, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled PREVAIL trial. Asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic chemotherapy‐naïve patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer progressing on androgen deprivation therapy were randomized one‐to‐one to 160 mg/day oral enzalutamide or placebo until discontinuation on radiographic progression or skeletal‐related event and initiation of subsequent antineoplastic therapy. Coprimary end‐points were centrally assessed radiographic progression‐free survival and overall survival. Secondary end‐points were investigator‐assessed radiographic progression‐free survival, time to initiation of chemotherapy, time to prostate‐specific antigen progression, prostate‐specific antigen response (≥50% decline) and time to skeletal‐related event.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Of 1717 patients, 61 were enrolled in Japan (enzalutamide, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 28; placebo, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 33); hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of 0.30 for centrally assessed radiographic progression‐free survival (0.03–2.95), 0.59 for overall survival (0.20–1.8), 0.46 for time to chemotherapy (0.22–0.96) and 0.36 for time to prostate‐specific antigen progression (0.17–0.75) showed the treatment benefit of enzalutamide over the placebo. Prostate‐specific antigen responses were observed in 60.7% of enzalutamide‐treated men versus 21.2% of placebo‐treated men. Plasma concentrations of enzalutamide were higher in Japanese patients: the geometric mean ratio of Japanese/non‐Japanese patients was 1.126 (90% confidence interval 1.018–1.245) at 13 weeks. Treatment‐related adverse events grade ≥3 occurred in 3.6% of enzalutamide‐ and 6.1% of placebo‐treated Japanese patients.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Treatment effects and safety in Japanese patients were generally consistent with the overall results from PREVAIL.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Journal

Citations (4)*help

See more

References(27)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Keywords

Report a problem

Back to top