- 【Updated on May 12, 2025】 Integration of CiNii Dissertations and CiNii Books into CiNii Research
- Trial version of CiNii Research Automatic Translation feature is available on CiNii Labs
- Suspension and deletion of data provided by Nikkei BP
- Regarding the recording of “Research Data” and “Evidence Data”
Estimating hominid life history: the critical interbirth interval
-
- Wataru Nakahashi
- School of Social Sciences Waseda University Nishi‐Waseda 1‐6‐1, Shinjuku 169‐8050 Tokyo Japan
-
- Shiro Horiuchi
- Faculty of International Tourism Hannan University Amamiminami Matsubara 1‐108‐1 580‐0033 Osaka Japan
-
- Yasuo Ihara
- Department of Biological Sciences The University of Tokyo Hongo 7‐3‐1, Bunkyo 113‐0033 Tokyo Japan
Search this article
Description
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Unlike any great apes, humans have expanded into a wide variety of habitats during the course of evolution, beginning with the transition by australopithecines from forest to savanna habitation. Novel environments are likely to have imposed hominids a demographic challenge due to such factors as higher predation risk and scarcer food resources. In fact, recent studies have found a paucity of older relative to younger adults in hominid fossil remains, indicating considerably high adult mortality in australopithecines, early <jats:italic>Homo</jats:italic>, and Neanderthals. It is not clear to date why only human ancestors among all hominoid species could survive in these harsh environments. In this paper, we explore the possibility that hominids had shorter interbirth intervals to enhance fertility than the extant apes. To infer interbirth intervals in fossil hominids, we introduce the notion of the critical interbirth interval, or the threshold length of birth spacing above which a population is expected to go to extinction. We develop a new method to obtain the critical interbirth intervals of hominids based on the observed ratios of older adults to all adults in fossil samples. Our analysis suggests that the critical interbirth intervals of australopithecines, early <jats:italic>Homo</jats:italic>, and Neanderthals are significantly shorter than the observed interbirth intervals of extant great apes. We also discuss possible factors that may have caused the evolutionary divergence of hominid life history traits from those of great apes.</jats:p>
Journal
-
- Population Ecology
-
Population Ecology 60 (1-2), 127-142, 2018-04
Wiley
- Tweet
Details 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360848656228128384
-
- ISSN
- 1438390X
- 14383896
-
- Article Type
- journal article
-
- Data Source
-
- Crossref
- KAKEN
- OpenAIRE