The cyclophosphamide equivalent dose as an approach for quantifying alkylating agent exposure: A report from the childhood cancer survivor study

  • Daniel M. Green
    Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee
  • Vikki G. Nolan
    Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Memphis Memphis Tennessee
  • Pamela J. Goodman
    Clinical Statistics and Cancer Prevention Programs Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington
  • John A. Whitton
    Clinical Statistics and Cancer Prevention Programs Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington
  • DeoKumar Srivastava
    Department of Biostatistics St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee
  • Wendy M. Leisenring
    Clinical Statistics and Cancer Prevention Programs Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle Washington
  • Joseph P. Neglia
    Department of Pediatrics University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota
  • Charles A. Sklar
    Department of Pediatrics Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center New York New York
  • Sue C. Kaste
    Department of Radiological Sciences St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee
  • Melissa M. Hudson
    Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee
  • Lisa R. Diller
    Department of Pediatric Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Center Boston Massachusetts
  • Marilyn Stovall
    Department of Radiation Physics The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
  • Sarah S. Donaldson
    Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford University Medical Center Stanford California
  • Leslie L. Robison
    Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis Tennessee

Description

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Estimation of the risk of adverse long‐term outcomes such as second malignant neoplasms and infertility often requires reproducible quantification of exposures. The method for quantification should be easily utilized and valid across different study populations. The widely used Alkylating Agent Dose (AAD) score is derived from the drug dose distribution of the study population and thus cannot be used for comparisons across populations as each will have a unique distribution of drug doses.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We compared the performance of the Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose (CED), a unit for quantifying alkylating agent exposure independent of study population, to the AAD. Comparisons included associations from three Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) outcome analyses, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and goodness of fit based on the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The CED and AAD performed essentially identically in analyses of risk for pregnancy among the partners of male CCSS participants, risk for adverse dental outcomes among all CCSS participants and risk for premature menopause among female CCSS participants, based on similar associations, lack of statistically significant differences between the areas under the ROC curves and similar model fit values for the AIC between models including the two measures of exposure.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>The CED is easily calculated, facilitating its use for patient counseling. It is independent of the drug dose distribution of a particular patient population, a characteristic that will allow direct comparisons of outcomes among epidemiological cohorts. We recommend the use of the CED in future research assessing cumulative alkylating agent exposure. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:53–67. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Journal

Citations (3)*help

See more

Report a problem

Back to top