Cardiovascular mortality in obstructive sleep apnoea treated with continuous positive airway pressure or oral appliance: An observational study

  • Anil Anandam
    Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Department of Medicine Department of Social and Preventive Medicine Western New York Respiratory Research Center Buffalo New York USA
  • Monali Patil
    Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Department of Medicine Department of Social and Preventive Medicine Western New York Respiratory Research Center Buffalo New York USA
  • Morohunfolu Akinnusi
    Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Department of Medicine Department of Social and Preventive Medicine Western New York Respiratory Research Center Buffalo New York USA
  • Philippe Jaoude
    Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Department of Medicine Department of Social and Preventive Medicine Western New York Respiratory Research Center Buffalo New York USA
  • Ali A. El‐Solh
    Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Department of Medicine Department of Social and Preventive Medicine Western New York Respiratory Research Center Buffalo New York USA

Description

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background and objective</jats:title><jats:p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the long‐term cardiovascular mortality in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OSA</jats:styled-content>) treated with either continuous positive airway pressure (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CPAP</jats:styled-content>) or mandibular advancing device (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MAD</jats:styled-content>).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>A non‐concurrent cohort study of 570 subjects with severe <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OSA</jats:styled-content> (apnoea/hypopnoea index (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AHI</jats:styled-content>) ≥ 30/h) and a control group of 269 subjects (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AHI</jats:styled-content> < 5/h) were followed up for a median of 79 months (interquartile range 76–88 months). All patients received <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CPAP</jats:styled-content> initially. <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MAD</jats:styled-content> was offered for those who were non‐adherent to <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CPAP</jats:styled-content>. The endpoint was cardiovascular death.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Two hundred and eight control subjects, 177 patients treated with <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CPAP</jats:styled-content>, 72 with <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MAD</jats:styled-content> and 212 who declined treatment were analysed. Forty‐two patients had a fatal cardiovascular event during the course of the study. The non‐apnoeic group had the lowest cardiovascular death rate (0.28 per 100 person‐years (95% confidence interval (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>): 0.08–0.71)) followed by the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CPAP</jats:styled-content>‐treated (0.56 per 100 person‐years (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.20–1.23)) and the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MAD</jats:styled-content>‐treated <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OSA</jats:styled-content> group (0.61 per 100 person‐years (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.13–1.78)), with the highest cardiovascular mortality rate observed in the untreated <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OSA</jats:styled-content> group (2.1 per 100 person‐years (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 1.37–2.92)). Although residual <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AHI</jats:styled-content> for <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MAD</jats:styled-content>‐treated patients was significantly higher than <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CPAP</jats:styled-content>‐treated patients (16.3 ± 5.1/h vs. 4.5 ± 2.3/h; <jats:italic><jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">P</jats:styled-content></jats:italic> < 0.001), there was no difference in cardiovascular death rate between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.08 (95% <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CI</jats:styled-content>: 0.55–1.74); <jats:italic><jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">P</jats:styled-content></jats:italic> = 0.71).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Both <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CPAP</jats:styled-content> and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MAD</jats:styled-content> may be equally effective therapy in reducing the risk of fatal cardiovascular events in patients with severe <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">OSA</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Journal

  • Respirology

    Respirology 18 (8), 1184-1190, 2013-10-28

    Wiley

Citations (7)*help

See more

Report a problem

Back to top