Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) Detection: Comparison of Two Molecular Methods (IDI-MRSA PCR Assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR Assay) with Three Selective MRSA Agars (MRSA ID, MRSA <i>Select</i> , and CHROMagar MRSA) for Use with Infection-Control Swabs

  • S. J. van Hal
    Department of Microbiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst 2010 NSW, Australia
  • D. Stark
    Department of Microbiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst 2010 NSW, Australia
  • B. Lockwood
    Department of Microbiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst 2010 NSW, Australia
  • D. Marriott
    Department of Microbiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst 2010 NSW, Australia
  • J. Harkness
    Department of Microbiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst 2010 NSW, Australia

説明

<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title> <jats:p> Methicillin-resistant <jats:italic>Staphylococcus aureus</jats:italic> (MRSA) is an increasing problem. Rapid detection of MRSA-colonized patients has the potential to limit spread of the organism. We evaluated the sensitivities and specificities of MRSA detection by two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) and three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSA <jats:italic>Select</jats:italic> , and CHROMagar MRSA), using 205 (101 nasal, 52 groin, and 52 axillary samples) samples from consecutive known MRSA-infected and/or -colonized patients. All detection methods had higher MRSA detection rates for nasal swabs than for axillary and groin swabs. Detection of MRSA by IDI-MRSA was the most sensitive method, independent of the site (94% for nasal samples, 80% for nonnasal samples, and 90% overall). The sensitivities of the GenoType MRSA Direct assay and the MRSA ID, MRSA <jats:italic>Select</jats:italic> , and CHROMagar MRSA agars with nasal swabs were 70%, 72%, 68%, and 75%, respectively. All detection methods had high specificities (95 to 99%), independent of the swab site. Extended incubation for a further 24 h with selective MRSA agars increased the detection of MRSA, with a corresponding decline in specificity secondary to a significant increase in false-positive results. There was a noticeable difference in test performance of the GenoType MRSA Direct assay in detection of MRSA (28/38 samples [74%]) compared with detection of nonmultiresistant MRSA (17/31 samples [55%]) (susceptible to two or more non-β-lactam antibiotics). This was not observed with selective MRSA agar plates or IDI-MRSA. Although it is more expensive, in addition to rapid turnaround times of 2 to 4 h, IDI-MRSA offers greater detection of MRSA colonization, independent of the swab site, than do conventional selective agars and GenoType MRSA Direct. </jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (1)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ