Prediction of protein assemblies, the next frontier: The <scp>CASP14‐CAPRI</scp> experiment

  • Marc F. Lensink
    CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology University of Lille Lille France
  • Guillaume Brysbaert
    CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology University of Lille Lille France
  • Théo Mauri
    CNRS UMR8576 UGSF, Institute for Structural and Functional Glycobiology University of Lille Lille France
  • Nurul Nadzirin
    Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe), European Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL‐EBI) Cambridge UK
  • Sameer Velankar
    Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe), European Molecular Biology Laboratory European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL‐EBI) Cambridge UK
  • Raphael A. G. Chaleil
    Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory The Francis Crick Institute London UK
  • Tereza Clarence
    Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory The Francis Crick Institute London UK
  • Paul A. Bates
    Biomolecular Modelling Laboratory The Francis Crick Institute London UK
  • Ren Kong
    Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering Jiangsu University of Technology Changzhou China
  • Bin Liu
    Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering Jiangsu University of Technology Changzhou China
  • Guangbo Yang
    Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering Jiangsu University of Technology Changzhou China
  • Ming Liu
    Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering Jiangsu University of Technology Changzhou China
  • Hang Shi
    Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering Jiangsu University of Technology Changzhou China
  • Xufeng Lu
    Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering Jiangsu University of Technology Changzhou China
  • Shan Chang
    Institute of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, School of Electrical and Information Engineering Jiangsu University of Technology Changzhou China
  • Raj S. Roy
    Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA
  • Farhan Quadir
    Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA
  • Jian Liu
    Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA
  • Jianlin Cheng
    Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA
  • Anna Antoniak
    Faculty of Chemistry University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
  • Cezary Czaplewski
    Faculty of Chemistry University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
  • Artur Giełdoń
    Faculty of Chemistry University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
  • Mateusz Kogut
    Faculty of Chemistry University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
  • Agnieszka G. Lipska
    Faculty of Chemistry University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
  • Adam Liwo
    Faculty of Chemistry University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
  • Emilia A. Lubecka
    Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics Gdansk University of Technology Gdansk Poland
  • Martyna Maszota‐Zieleniak
    Faculty of Chemistry University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
  • Adam K. Sieradzan
    Faculty of Chemistry University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
  • Rafał Ślusarz
    Faculty of Chemistry University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
  • Patryk A. Wesołowski
    Faculty of Chemistry University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
  • Karolina Zięba
    Faculty of Chemistry University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
  • Carlos A. Del Carpio Muñoz
    Graduate School of Medical Sciences Nagoya City University Nagoya Japan
  • Eiichiro Ichiishi
    International University of Health and Welfare Hospital (IUHW Hospital) Nasushiobara City Japan
  • Ameya Harmalkar
    Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA
  • Jeffrey J. Gray
    Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA
  • Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
    Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Francesco Ambrosetti
    Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Rodrigo Vargas Honorato
    Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Zuzana Jandova
    Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Brian Jiménez‐García
    Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Panagiotis I. Koukos
    Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Siri Van Keulen
    Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Charlotte W. Van Noort
    Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Manon Réau
    Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Jorge Roel‐Touris
    Computational Structural Biology Group, Bijvoet Centre for Biomolecular Research, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
  • Sergei Kotelnikov
    Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York USA
  • Dzmitry Padhorny
    Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York USA
  • Kathryn A. Porter
    Department of Biomedical Engineering Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA
  • Andrey Alekseenko
    Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York USA
  • Mikhail Ignatov
    Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York USA
  • Israel Desta
    Department of Biomedical Engineering Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA
  • Ryota Ashizawa
    Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York USA
  • Zhuyezi Sun
    Department of Biomedical Engineering Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA
  • Usman Ghani
    Department of Biomedical Engineering Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA
  • Nasser Hashemi
    Department of Biomedical Engineering Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA
  • Sandor Vajda
    Department of Biomedical Engineering Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA
  • Dima Kozakov
    Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York USA
  • Mireia Rosell
    Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV) CSIC – Universidad de la Rioja – Gobierno de La Rioja Logrono Spain
  • Luis A. Rodríguez‐Lumbreras
    Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV) CSIC – Universidad de la Rioja – Gobierno de La Rioja Logrono Spain
  • Juan Fernandez‐Recio
    Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV) CSIC – Universidad de la Rioja – Gobierno de La Rioja Logrono Spain
  • Agnieszka Karczynska
    Université Grenoble Alpes, Inria, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK Grenoble France
  • Sergei Grudinin
    Université Grenoble Alpes, Inria, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJK Grenoble France
  • Yumeng Yan
    School of Physics Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
  • Hao Li
    School of Physics Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
  • Peicong Lin
    School of Physics Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
  • Sheng‐You Huang
    School of Physics Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan China
  • Charles Christoffer
    Department of Computer Science Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
  • Genki Terashi
    Department of Biological Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
  • Jacob Verburgt
    Department of Biological Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
  • Daipayan Sarkar
    Department of Biological Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
  • Tunde Aderinwale
    Department of Computer Science Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
  • Xiao Wang
    Department of Computer Science Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
  • Daisuke Kihara
    Department of Computer Science Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA
  • Tsukasa Nakamura
    Graduate School of Information Sciences Tohoku University Sendai Miyagi Japan
  • Yuya Hanazono
    Institute for Quantum Life Science, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology Tokai Ibaraki Japan
  • Ragul Gowthaman
    University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research Rockville Maryland USA
  • Johnathan D. Guest
    University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research Rockville Maryland USA
  • Rui Yin
    University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research Rockville Maryland USA
  • Ghazaleh Taherzadeh
    University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research Rockville Maryland USA
  • Brian G. Pierce
    University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research Rockville Maryland USA
  • Didier Barradas‐Bautista
    King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal Saudi Arabia
  • Zhen Cao
    King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal Saudi Arabia
  • Luigi Cavallo
    King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal Saudi Arabia
  • Romina Oliva
    University of Naples “Parthenope” Napoli Italy
  • Yuanfei Sun
    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Texas A&M University Texas USA
  • Shaowen Zhu
    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Texas A&M University Texas USA
  • Yang Shen
    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Texas A&M University Texas USA
  • Taeyong Park
    Department of Chemistry Seoul National University Seoul Republic of Korea
  • Hyeonuk Woo
    Department of Chemistry Seoul National University Seoul Republic of Korea
  • Jinsol Yang
    Department of Chemistry Seoul National University Seoul Republic of Korea
  • Sohee Kwon
    Department of Chemistry Seoul National University Seoul Republic of Korea
  • Jonghun Won
    Department of Chemistry Seoul National University Seoul Republic of Korea
  • Chaok Seok
    Department of Chemistry Seoul National University Seoul Republic of Korea
  • Yasuomi Kiyota
    School of Pharmacy Kitasato University Minato‐ku Tokyo Japan
  • Shinpei Kobayashi
    School of Pharmacy Kitasato University Minato‐ku Tokyo Japan
  • Yoshiki Harada
    School of Pharmacy Kitasato University Minato‐ku Tokyo Japan
  • Mayuko Takeda‐Shitaka
    School of Pharmacy Kitasato University Minato‐ku Tokyo Japan
  • Petras J. Kundrotas
    Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas USA
  • Amar Singh
    Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas USA
  • Ilya A. Vakser
    Computational Biology Program and Department of Molecular Biosciences University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas USA
  • Justas Dapkūnas
    Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
  • Kliment Olechnovič
    Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
  • Česlovas Venclovas
    Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
  • Rui Duan
    Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA
  • Liming Qiu
    Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA
  • Xianjin Xu
    Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA
  • Shuang Zhang
    Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA
  • Xiaoqin Zou
    Institute for Data Science and Informatics University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA
  • Shoshana J. Wodak
    Center for Structural Biology VIB‐VUB Brussels Belgium

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We present the results for CAPRI Round 50, the fourth joint CASP‐CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of twelve targets, including six dimers, three trimers, and three higher‐order oligomers. Four of these were easy targets, for which good structural templates were available either for the full assembly, or for the main interfaces (of the higher‐order oligomers). Eight were difficult targets for which only distantly related templates were found for the individual subunits. Twenty‐five CAPRI groups including eight automatic servers submitted ~1250 models per target. Twenty groups including six servers participated in the CAPRI scoring challenge submitted ~190 models per target. The accuracy of the predicted models was evaluated using the classical CAPRI criteria. The prediction performance was measured by a weighted scoring scheme that takes into account the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group as part of their five top‐ranking models. Compared to the previous CASP‐CAPRI challenge, top performing groups submitted such models for a larger fraction (70–75%) of the targets in this Round, but fewer of these models were of high accuracy. Scorer groups achieved stronger performance with more groups submitting correct models for 70–80% of the targets or achieving high accuracy predictions. Servers performed less well in general, except for the MDOCKPP and LZERD servers, who performed on par with human groups. In addition to these results, major advances in methodology are discussed, providing an informative overview of where the prediction of protein assemblies currently stands.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

参考文献 (74)*注記

もっと見る

関連プロジェクト

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ