Combination of psoas muscle mass index and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic predictor for patients undergoing <scp>nonsurgical</scp> hepatocellular carcinoma therapy

  • Yusuke Sugama
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Koji Miyanishi
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Takahiro Osuga
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Shingo Tanaka
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Kota Hamaguchi
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Ryo Ito
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Hiroki Sakamoto
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Tomohiro Kubo
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Hiroyuki Ohnuma
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Kazuyuki Murase
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Kohich Takada
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Masayoshi Kobune
    Department of Hematology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
  • Junji Kato
    Department of Medical Oncology Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Sapporo Japan

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background and Aim</jats:title><jats:p>Reliable predictors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are urgently needed. The psoas muscle index (PMI) is a simple and rapid method for evaluating muscle atrophy. Furthermore, the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a prognostic factor that is easy to calculate in everyday clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the value of the PMI and NLR as prognostic factors for patients receiving nonsurgical HCC therapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), or molecular targeted drugs such as sorafenib (SOR) and lenvatinib (LEN).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We enrolled 87 patients with HCC who were treated with HAIC, TACE, SOR, or LEN. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with variable PMI or NLR status. For Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)‐B patients, useful prognostic factors were examined by comparing the OS between stratified groups. Prognostic factors including PMI and NLR were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Analysis of HAIC or TACE (HAIC/TACE) and SOR or LEN (SOR/LEN) patients showed significant differences in OS between low and high PMI. In patients treated with TACE, there was a significant difference in OS between low and high NLR. For BCLC‐B and low PMI, the prognosis was significantly worse for SOR/LEN than for TACE, although there was no difference for high PMI, suggesting that PMI may be useful for treatment selection. In addition, the prognostic formula composed of PMI, NLR, and up‐to‐seven criteria developed in the present study may be useful.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>PMI and NLR are considered to be independent prognostic factors for HCC.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Journal

  • JGH Open

    JGH Open 5 (12), 1335-1343, 2021-11-19

    Wiley

References(40)*help

See more

Related Projects

See more

Report a problem

Back to top