Corporate Sustainable Development: is ‘Integrated Reporting’ a Legitimation Strategy?
-
- Alessandro Lai
- University of Verona Italy
-
- Gaia Melloni
- University of Verona Italy
-
- Riccardo Stacchezzini
- University of Verona Italy
書誌事項
- 公開日
- 2014-10-31
- 権利情報
-
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
- DOI
-
- 10.1002/bse.1863
- 公開者
- Wiley
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In the field of sustainability reporting (SR), the so‐called ‘integrated report’ (IR) is gaining momentum. In spite of its voluntary nature, a growing number of firms are adopting IR by participating in the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) Pilot Programme. Stimulated by concerns on the use of SR as a legitimation strategy, the paper investigates whether the decision to adopt an IR stems from the need to repair legitimacy threats. By showing that IR adopters have significantly higher Bloomberg ESG disclosure ratings relative to non‐adopters, we reject the hypothesis of firms adopting IR as a response to a poor rating. Additionally, we show that other proxies of legitimacy pressures (size, leverage, profitability, industry) do not play a role in explaining IR adoption. Overall, our evidence suggests that corporate engagement in IR is not a matter of strategic legitimation. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</jats:p>
収録刊行物
-
- Business Strategy and the Environment
-
Business Strategy and the Environment 25 (3), 165-177, 2014-10-31
Wiley
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1360857597741227264
-
- DOI
- 10.1002/bse.1863
-
- ISSN
- 10990836
- 09644733
-
- データソース種別
-
- Crossref