Researchers, patients, and other stakeholders’ perspectives on challenges to and strategies for engagement

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>There is growing interest in patient and stakeholder engagement in research, yet limited evidence about effective methods. Since 2012, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) has funded patient-centered comparative effectiveness research with a requirement for engaging patients and other stakeholders as research partners in study planning, conduct, and dissemination. This requirement, unique among large healthcare research funders in the US, provides an opportunity to learn about challenges encountered and specific strategies used by PCORI-funded study teams. The primary objective of this study is to describe -- from the perspective of PCORI investigators and research partners—the most common engagement challenges encountered in the first two years of the projects and promising strategies to prevent and overcome these challenges.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Descriptive information about investigators, partners, and their engagement was collected from investigators via annual (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 235) and mid-year (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 40) project progress reporting to PCORI, and from their partners (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 260) via voluntary survey. Qualitative data were analyzed using content and thematic analyses.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Investigators and partners most often described engagement challenges in three domains: (1) infrastructure to support engagement, (2) building relationships, and (3) maintaining relationships. Infrastructure challenges related to financial and human resources, including funding support and dedicated staff, identifying diverse groups of partners, and partners’ logistical needs. Challenges for both building and maintaining relationships encompass a variety of aspects of authentic, positive interactions that facilitate mutual understanding, full participation, and genuine influence on the projects. Strategies to prevent or mitigate engagement challenges also corresponded overall to the same three domains. Both groups typically described strategies more generally, with applicability to a range of challenges rather than specific actions to address only particular challenges.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Meaningful engagement of patients and other stakeholders comes with challenges, as does any innovation in the research process. The challenges and promising practices identified by these investigators and partners, related to engagement infrastructure and the building and maintenance of relationships, reveal actionable areas to improve engagement, including organizational policies and resources, training, new engagement models, and supporting engagement by viewing it as an investment in research uptake and impact.</jats:p> </jats:sec>