Premorbid self‐disorders and lifetime diagnosis in the schizophrenia spectrum: a prospective high‐risk study
-
- Josef Parnas
- Center for Subjectivity Research University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
-
- John Carter
- Horizon Consumer Science Glendale California USA
-
- Julie Nordgaard
- Psychiatric Center Hvidovre University of Copenhagen Hvidovre Denmark
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>The notion of a disordered self as a core disturbance of schizophrenia was proposed in many foundational texts. Recent studies, spurred by the development of the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">E</jats:styled-content>xamination of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">A</jats:styled-content>nomalous <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">S</jats:styled-content>elf‐<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">E</jats:styled-content>xperience (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EASE</jats:styled-content>), seem to indicate that self‐disorders are a specific manifestation of schizophrenia vulnerability. Follow‐up studies of help‐seeking, prodromal and first‐admission patients have demonstrated the utility of self‐disorders for predicting later schizophrenia‐spectrum disturbance. We wished to extend these findings by gauging the predictive value of self‐disorders in a premorbid, non‐clinical population at high risk for schizophrenia.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Children from the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">C</jats:styled-content>openhagen <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">H</jats:styled-content>igh‐<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">R</jats:styled-content>isk <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">P</jats:styled-content>roject with high‐genetic risk for schizophrenia (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 212) were assessed premorbidly (average age = 15), and diagnostically re‐evaluated after 10 and 25 years. Since the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EASE</jats:styled-content> was not available at the time of premorbid assessment, we hypothesized that a proxy scale drawn from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MMPI</jats:styled-content>) could distinguish those who later developed a schizophrenia‐spectrum disorder (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 68) from those who remained healthy (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 64). The <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">S</jats:styled-content>elf‐<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">D</jats:styled-content>isorder Scale comprised 32 items whose content suggested an aspect of self‐disorder as measured by the <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EASE</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Premorbid Self‐Disorder Scale scores significantly predicted lifetime schizophrenia‐spectrum diagnosis in the high‐risk cohort. Although there was considerable item overlap between the new scale and an existing <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MMPI</jats:styled-content> scale (psychoticism), the overlap did not account for the Self‐Disorder Scale's predictive efficacy.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>The results support the notion of self‐disorders as a core vulnerability feature in schizophrenia, detectable premorbidly in those developing later schizophrenia‐spectrum disorders.</jats:p></jats:sec>
収録刊行物
-
- Early Intervention in Psychiatry
-
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 10 (1), 45-53, 2014-04-11
Wiley