<scp>Smartphone‐Based</scp> Applications to Detect Hearing Loss: A Review of Current Technology
-
- Alexandria L. Irace
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons NewYork‐Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USA
-
- Rahul K. Sharma
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons NewYork‐Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USA
-
- Nicholas S. Reed
- Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland USA
-
- Justin S. Golub
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons NewYork‐Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USA
書誌事項
- 公開日
- 2020-12-29
- 権利情報
-
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
- DOI
-
- 10.1111/jgs.16985
- 公開者
- Wiley
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:sec> <jats:title>Background/Objectives</jats:title> <jats:p>Age‐related hearing loss (ARHL) is a widely prevalent yet manageable condition that has been linked to neurocognitive and psychiatric comorbidities. Multiple barriers hinder older individuals from being diagnosed with ARHL through pure‐tone audiometry. This is especially true during the COVID‐19 pandemic, which has resulted in the closure of many outpatient audiology and otolaryngology offices. Smartphone‐based hearing assessment apps may overcome these challenges by enabling patients to remotely self‐administer their own hearing examination. The objective of this review is to provide an up‐to‐date overview of current mobile health applications (apps) that claim to assess hearing.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Design</jats:title> <jats:p>Narrative review.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Measurements</jats:title> <jats:p>The Apple App Store and Google Play Store were queried for apps that claim to assess hearing. Relevant apps were downloaded and used to conduct a mock hearing assessment. Names of included apps were searched on four literature databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) to determine which apps had been validated against gold standard methods.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>App store searches identified 44 unique apps. Apps differed with respect to the type of test offered (e.g., hearing threshold test), cost, strategies to reduce ambient noise, test output (quantitative vs qualitative results), and options to export results. Validation studies were identified for seven apps.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Given their low cost and relative accessibility, smartphone‐based hearing apps may facilitate screening for ARHL, particularly in the setting of limitations on in‐person medical care due to COVID‐19. However, app features vary widely, few apps have been validated, and user‐centered designs for older adults are largely lacking. Further research and validation efforts are necessary to determine whether smartphone‐based hearing assessments are a feasible and accurate screening tool for ARHL.</jats:p> <jats:p> <jats:boxed-text content-type="box" position="float"> <jats:caption> <jats:title>Key Points</jats:title> </jats:caption> <jats:p> <jats:list list-type="bullet"> <jats:list-item> <jats:p>Age‐related hearing loss is a prevalent yet undertreated condition among older adults.</jats:p> </jats:list-item> </jats:list> <jats:list list-type="simple"> <jats:title>Why Does this Paper Matter?</jats:title> <jats:list-item> <jats:p> Smartphone‐based hearing test apps may facilitate remote screening for hearing loss, but limitations surrounding app validation, usability, equipment calibration, and data security should be addressed.</jats:p> </jats:list-item> </jats:list> </jats:p> </jats:boxed-text> </jats:p> </jats:sec>
収録刊行物
-
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
-
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 69 (2), 307-316, 2020-12-29
Wiley
