A comparison of two dressings in the management of chronic wounds

  • S. Thomas
    Director, Surgical Materials Testing Laboratory, Bridgend General Hospital, Mid Glamorgan
  • V. Banks
    Research Nurse, Surgical Materials Testing Laboratory, Bridgend General Hospital, Mid Glamorgan
  • S. Bale
    Nursing Director, Wound Healing Research Unit, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff
  • M. Fear-Price
    Wound Healing Research Unit, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff
  • S. Hagelstein
    Research Nurse, Surgical Materials Testing Laboratory, Bridgend General Hospital, Mid Glamorgan
  • K.G. Harding
    Director, Wound Healing Research Unit, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff
  • J. Orpin
    Research Nurse, Wound Healing Research Unit, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff
  • N. Thomas
    Dip Community Health Studies, Research Nurse

書誌事項

公開日
1997-09-02
DOI
  • 10.12968/jowc.1997.6.8.383
公開者
Mark Allen Group

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:p> A hydropolymer dressing (Tielle) and a hydrocolloid dressing (Granuflex) were compared In a randomised controlled clinical study involving 100 patients with leg ulcers and 99 patients with pressure sores in the community. </jats:p><jats:p> Statistically significant differences in favour of the hydropolymer dressing were detected for dressing leakage and odour production, but no statistically significant differences were recorded in the number of patients with either leg ulcers or pressure sores who healed in each treatment group. </jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ