Platelet production and platelet destruction: assessing mechanisms of treatment effect in immune thrombocytopenia

  • Sarah J. Barsam
    Platelet Disorders Center, Department of Pediatrics, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY;
  • Bethan Psaila
    Platelet Disorders Center, Department of Pediatrics, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY;
  • Marc Forestier
    Department of Medicine, Laboratory for Thrombosis Research, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland;
  • Lemke K. Page
    Platelet Disorders Center, Department of Pediatrics, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY;
  • Peter A. Sloane
    Platelet Disorders Center, Department of Pediatrics, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY;
  • Julia T. Geyer
    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and
  • Glynis O. Villarica
    Platelet Disorders Center, Department of Pediatrics, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY;
  • Mary M. Ruisi
    Platelet Disorders Center, Department of Pediatrics, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY;
  • Terry B. Gernsheimer
    Puget Sound Blood Centre, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
  • Juerg H. Beer
    Department of Medicine, Laboratory for Thrombosis Research, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland;
  • James B. Bussel
    Platelet Disorders Center, Department of Pediatrics, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY;

書誌事項

公開日
2011-05-26
DOI
  • 10.1182/blood-2010-11-321398
公開者
American Society of Hematology

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This study investigated the immature platelet fraction (IPF) in assessing treatment effects in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). IPF was measured on the Sysmex XE2100 autoanalyzer. The mean absolute-IPF (A-IPF) was lower for ITP patients than for healthy controls (3.2 vs 7.8 × 109/L, P < .01), whereas IPF percentage was greater (29.2% vs 3.2%, P < .01). All 5 patients with a platelet response to Eltrombopag, a thrombopoietic agent, but none responding to an anti-FcγRIII antibody, had corresponding A-IPF responses. Seven of 7 patients responding to RhoD immuneglobulin (anti-D) and 6 of 8 responding to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) did not have corresponding increases in A-IPF, but 2 with IVIG and 1 with IVIG anti-D did. This supports inhibition of platelet destruction as the primary mechanism of intravenous anti-D and IVIG, although IVIG may also enhance thrombopoiesis. Plasma glycocalicin, released during platelet destruction, normalized as glycocalicin index, was higher in ITP patients than controls (31.36 vs 1.75, P = .001). There was an inverse correlation between glycocalicin index and A-IPF in ITP patients (r2 = −0.578, P = .015), demonstrating the relationship between platelet production and destruction. Nonresponders to thrombopoietic agents had increased megakaryocytes but not increased A-IPF, suggesting that antibodies blocked platelet release. In conclusion, A-IPF measures real-time thrombopoiesis, providing insight into mechanisms of treatment effect.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

  • Blood

    Blood 117 (21), 5723-5732, 2011-05-26

    American Society of Hematology

被引用文献 (3)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ