Interannual variability and timing of growing‐season CO<sub>2</sub> exchange in a boreal forest

  • Tanja Suni
    Department of Physical Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
  • Frank Berninger
    Department of Forest Ecology University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
  • Tiina Markkanen
    Department of Physical Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
  • Petri Keronen
    Department of Physical Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
  • Üllar Rannik
    Department of Physical Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
  • Timo Vesala
    Department of Physical Sciences University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

書誌事項

公開日
2003-05-06
権利情報
  • http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
DOI
  • 10.1029/2002jd002381
公開者
American Geophysical Union (AGU)

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:p>We studied the interannual variability of cumulative net ecosystem CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> exchange (NEE) and its connection with cumulative or average climatic variables during five growing seasons. The analysis was based on a 5‐year‐long time series of CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> flux measured from April 1996 to April 2001 in a Scots pine forest in southern Finland by the eddy covariance technique. The onset of the ecosystem growing season was best connected with air temperature, and the end of the growing season was best connected with day length. With these variables we were able to predict the timing and the length of each growing season within 0–3 days. The forest was a sink of carbon with little interannual variability: The uptake during the four full growing seasons varied by 80 g C m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>, ranging from 230 to 310 g C m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>. The estimated winter release each year varied between 60 and 90 g C m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup>. The interannual variation in seasonal (spring, summer, autumn) carbon exchange ranged from 30 g C m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> in autumn and spring to 80 g C m<jats:sup>−2</jats:sup> in summer. The average climatic variables explained the variability of the seasonal or growing‐season cumulative NEE only partly. Both the daytime and the nighttime CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> fluxes contributed markedly to the variability in carbon exchange, indicating that photosynthesis and respiration have an equally important influence on NEE.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (2)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ