Cervical surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

  • Praveen V. Mummaneni
    Department of Neurosurgery, University of California at San Francisco, California;
  • Michael G. Kaiser
    Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York;
  • Paul G. Matz
    Division of Neurological Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama;
  • Paul A. Anderson
    Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and
  • Michael W. Groff
    Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • Robert F. Heary
    Department of Neurosurgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey—New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey;
  • Langston T. Holly
    Division of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, California;
  • Timothy C. Ryken
    Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa;
  • Tanvir F. Choudhri
    Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York; and
  • Edward J. Vresilovic
    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
  • Daniel K. Resnick
    Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin;

抄録

<jats:sec> <jats:title>Object</jats:title> <jats:p>The objective of this systematic review was to use evidence-based medicine to compare the efficacy of different surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).</jats:p></jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>The National Library of Medicine and Cochrane Database were queried using MeSH headings and keywords relevant to anterior and posterior cervical spine surgery and CSM. The guidelines group assembled an evidentiary table summarizing the quality of evidence (Classes I–III). The group formulated recommendations that contained the degree of strength based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines network. Validation was done through peer review by the Joint Guidelines Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons.</jats:p></jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>A variety of techniques have improved functional outcome after surgical treatment for CSM, including anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (ACCF), laminoplasty, laminectomy, and laminectomy with fusion (Class III). Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and ACCF appear to yield similar results in multilevel spine decompression for lesions at the disc level. The use of anterior plating allows for equivalent fusion rates between these techniques (Class III). If anterior fixation is not used, ACCF may provide a higher fusion rate than multilevel ACDF but also a higher graft failure rate than multilevel ACDF (Class III). Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion, ACCF, laminectomy, laminoplasty, and laminectomy with arthrodesis all provide near-term functional improvement for CSM. However, laminectomy is associated with late deterioration compared with the other types of anterior and posterior surgeries (Class III).</jats:p></jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Multiple approaches exist with similar near-term improvements; however, laminectomy appears to have a late deterioration rate that may need to be considered when appropriate.</jats:p></jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (5)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ