Prospective Study of Urinary Prostaglandin E<sub>2</sub> Metabolite and Colorectal Cancer Risk

  • Qiuyin Cai
    From the Department of Medicine, Center for Epidemiology Research, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; and the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Yu-Tang Gao
    From the Department of Medicine, Center for Epidemiology Research, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; and the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Wong-Ho Chow
    From the Department of Medicine, Center for Epidemiology Research, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; and the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Xiao-Ou Shu
    From the Department of Medicine, Center for Epidemiology Research, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; and the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Gong Yang
    From the Department of Medicine, Center for Epidemiology Research, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; and the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Bu-Tian Ji
    From the Department of Medicine, Center for Epidemiology Research, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; and the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Wanqing Wen
    From the Department of Medicine, Center for Epidemiology Research, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; and the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Nathaniel Rothman
    From the Department of Medicine, Center for Epidemiology Research, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; and the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Hong-Lan Li
    From the Department of Medicine, Center for Epidemiology Research, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; and the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Jason D. Morrow
    From the Department of Medicine, Center for Epidemiology Research, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; and the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
  • Wei Zheng
    From the Department of Medicine, Center for Epidemiology Research, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; and the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

Description

<jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p> Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) has been shown to play a major role in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. However, no human study has directly investigated whether biomarkers of COX-2 overexpression may predict colorectal cancer risk. We evaluated the association of urinary prostaglandin E<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> metabolite (PGE-M) levels and colorectal cancer risk </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> A nested case-control study was conducted within the Shanghai Women's Health Study, in which 74,942 Chinese women ages 40 to 70 years were recruited from 1997 to 2000. Urinary PGE-M in 150 cohort members who developed colorectal cancer during the follow-up were compared with 150 matched controls. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> The baseline level of urinary PGE-M was more than 50% higher in cases than in controls. The relative risks (RRs) of developing colorectal cancer were elevated from 1.0 to 2.5 (95% CI, 1.1 to 5.8), 4.5 (95% CI, 1.9 to 10.9), and 5.6 (95% CI, 2.4 to 13.5) with increasing quartiles of urinary PGE-M levels (P for trend < .001). The positive association was observed for both colon cancer (RR = 4.9; 95% CI, 1.7 to 14.7 for the highest v lowest quartile; P for trend = .009) and rectal cancer (RR = 7.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 30.7; P for trend = .048), and for colorectal cancer cases diagnosed in the first 30 months (RR = 7.6; 95% CI, 1.8 to 32.0; P for trend = .035) and subsequent months (RR = 4.4, 95% CI, 1.5 to 13.3; P for trend = .012) of follow-up. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> Given its strong association with colorectal cancer risk, urinary PGE-M may be a promising biomarker for risk assessment of this common malignancy. </jats:p></jats:sec>

Journal

Citations (6)*help

See more

Details 詳細情報について

Report a problem

Back to top