Patient and public involvement: how much do we spend and what are the benefits?
-
- Elena Pizzo
- Imperial College Business School London UK
-
- Cathal Doyle
- NIHR CLAHRC for Northwest London Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK
-
- Rachel Matthews
- NIHR CLAHRC for Northwest London Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London UK
-
- James Barlow
- Technology and Innovation Management Imperial College Business School London UK
説明
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background and objectives</jats:title><jats:p>Patient and public involvement (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PPI</jats:styled-content>) is seen as a way of helping to shape health policy and ensure a patient‐focused health‐care system. While evidence indicates that<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PPI</jats:styled-content>can improve health‐care decision making, it also consumes monetary and non‐monetary resources. Given the financial climate, it is important to start thinking about the costs and benefits of<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PPI</jats:styled-content>and how to evaluate it in economic terms.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>We conducted a literature review to assess the potential benefits and costs of involvement and the challenges in carrying out an economic evaluation of<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PPI</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The benefits of<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PPI</jats:styled-content>include effects on the design of new projects or services, on<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">NHS</jats:styled-content>governance, on research design and implementation and on citizenship and equity. Economic evaluation of<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PPI</jats:styled-content>activities is limited. The lack of an appropriate analytical framework, data recording and understanding of the potential costs and benefits of<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PPI</jats:styled-content>, especially from participants' perspectives, represent serious constraints on the full evaluation of<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PPI</jats:styled-content>.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>By recognizing the value of<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">PPI</jats:styled-content>, health‐care providers and commissioners can embed it more effectively within their organizations. Better knowledge of costs may prompt organizations to effectively plan, execute, evaluate and target resources. This should increase the likelihood of more meaningful activity, avoid tokenism and enhance organizational efficiency and reputation.</jats:p></jats:sec>
収録刊行物
-
- Health Expectations
-
Health Expectations 18 (6), 1918-1926, 2014-05-12
Wiley