Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant treatment modalities and definitive non-surgical therapy for oesophageal squamous cell cancer

  • M Kranzfelder
    Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • T Schuster
    Institute for Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • H Geinitz
    Department of Radiotherapy and Radiological Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • H Friess
    Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  • P Büchler
    Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

説明

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The standard treatment for resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is surgical resection with adequate lymphadenectomy. Most Western patients receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In recent years some patients have received CRT alone (definitive CRT, dCRT). This meta-analysis sought to clarify the benefits of neoadjuvant and definitive treatment for OSCC.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified using the Cochrane database, MEDLINE and Embase. Only RCTs with intention-to-treat analysis, and published hazard ratios (HRs) or estimates from survival data, were included.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Nine RCTs involving neoadjuvant CRT versus surgery, eight involving neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery, and three involving neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery or surgery alone versus dCRT were identified. The HR for overall survival was 0·81 (95 per cent confidence interval 0·70 to 0·95; P = 0·008) after neoadjuvant CRT and 0·93 (0·81 to 1·08; P = 0·368) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The likelihood of R0 resection was significantly higher after neoadjuvant treatment (CRT: HR 1·15, P = 0·043; chemotherapy: HR 1·16, P = 0·006). Morbidity rates were not increased after neoadjuvant CRT (HR 0·94, P = 0·363) but 30-day mortality was non-significantly higher with combined treatment. Morbidity (HR 1·03, P = 0·638) and mortality (HR 1·04, P = 0·810) rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery did not differ from those after surgery alone. None of the RCTs reporting outcome after dCRT demonstrated a significant survival benefit, but treatment-related mortality rates were lower (HR 7·60, P = 0·007) than with neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery or surgery alone.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>For patients with resectable OSCC, a significant survival benefit for neoadjuvant CRT was evident, with no increase in morbidity rate. dCRT did not demonstrate any survival benefit over other curative strategies.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (6)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ