Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator versus Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Pacemaker on Mortality in Heart Failure Patients: Results of a High-Volume, Single-Centre Experience
-
- Valentina Kutyifa
- Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center , Budapest ,
-
- Laszlo Geller
- Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center , Budapest ,
-
- Peter Bogyi
- Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center , Budapest ,
-
- Endre Zima
- Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center , Budapest ,
-
- Mehmet K. Aktas
- University of Rochester, Medical Center , Rochester, NY ,
-
- Emin Evren Ozcan
- Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center , Budapest ,
-
- David Becker
- Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center , Budapest ,
-
- Vivien Klaudia Nagy
- Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center , Budapest ,
-
- Annamaria Kosztin
- Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center , Budapest ,
-
- Szabolcs Szilagyi
- Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center , Budapest ,
-
- Bela Merkely
- Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center , Budapest ,
書誌事項
- 公開日
- 2014-11-07
- 権利情報
-
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
- DOI
-
- 10.1002/ejhf.185
- 公開者
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Aims</jats:title> <jats:p>There are limited and contradictory data on the effects of CRT with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) on mortality as compared with CRT with pacemaker (CRT-P).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods and results</jats:title> <jats:p>We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients implanted with a CRT-D or CRT-P device in our high-volume single-centre experience. Data on all-cause mortality were derived from clinic visits and the Hungarian National Healthcare Fund Death Registry. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate all-cause mortality in patients with CRT-D vs. CRT-P, stratified by the aetiology of cardiomyopathy. From 2000 to 2011, 1122 CRT devices, 693 CRT-P (LVEF 28.2 ± 7.4%) and 429 CRT-D (LVEF 27.6 ± 6.4%), were implanted at our centre. During the median follow-up of 28 months, 379 patients died from any cause, 250 patients (36%) with an implanted CRT-P and 129 patients (30%) with an implanted CRT-D. There was no evidence of mortality benefit in patients implanted with a CRT-D compared with a CRT-P in the total cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73–1.32, P = 0.884]. In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, CRT-D treatment was associated with a significant 30% risk reduction in all-cause mortality compared with an implanted CRT-P (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51–0.97, P = 0.03). In non-ischaemic patients, there was no mortality benefit of CRT-D over CRT-P (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73–1.32, P = 0.894, interaction P-value = 0.15).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>In heart failure patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, CRT-D was associated with a mortality benefit compared with CRT-P, but no benefit of CRT-D over CRT-P in mortality was observed in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
収録刊行物
-
- European Journal of Heart Failure
-
European Journal of Heart Failure 16 (12), 1323-1330, 2014-11-07
Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Tweet
詳細情報 詳細情報について
-
- CRID
- 1361418521449890944
-
- DOI
- 10.1002/ejhf.185
-
- ISSN
- 18790844
- 13889842
-
- データソース種別
-
- Crossref