Fluvial seismic geomorphology: a view from the surface

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Three-dimensional seismic data enable geoscientists to image the stratigraphic record along selected stratal or time slices. These slices provide detailed images of the planform geometry of ancient depositional systems and environments. In this presentation we attempt to provide a partial answer to the question: what kind of information do nonmarine channel and valley patterns and parameters convey regarding sediment load, channel stability, structural or climatic history of the area, and palaeochannel and reservoir architecture? Geomorphologists have long recognized four basic channel patterns: straight, meandering, braided and anastomosing. They have also developed a classification based on aerial pattern and sediment load. This relationship seems straightforward; however the patterns form a continuum with a great deal of complexity related to degree and character of sinuosity, braiding and anabranching. For example an equal- width sinuous pattern suggests moderate to high lateral stability, and low bed load to suspended load deposits. A wide bend sinuous pattern suggests low to moderate lateral stability, and higher bed load to suspended load deposits. Because of convergence and divergence, interpretation of controls on palaeochannel patterns is difficult. Nevertheless, a better understanding of the various controls on modem river morphology and dynamics can produce useful information regarding palaeo-systems. For example, river type (straight, braided, meandering and anastomosing) depends upon upstream controls such as geologic history (glaciated v. non-glaciated systems), tectonics (relief), lithology (sediment type) and climate (hydrology and vegetation), and downstream controls such as base-level (up and down) and length (avulsion). In addition, factors such as bedrock, active tectonics, floods and vegetation cause considerable pattern variability. Only by taking into account the effect of these controls and by using all available data can there be more predictive and interpretive explanations of seismic data.</jats:p>