Surface deformation and coherence measurements of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii, from SIR‐C radar interferometry

書誌事項

公開日
1996-10
権利情報
  • http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
DOI
  • 10.1029/96je01459
公開者
American Geophysical Union (AGU)

この論文をさがす

説明

<jats:p>The shuttle imaging radar C/X synthetic aperture radar (SIR‐C/X‐SAR) radar on board the space shuttle <jats:italic>Endeavor</jats:italic> imaged Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii, in April and October 1994 for the purpose of measuring active surface deformation by the methods of repeat‐pass differential radar interferometry. Observations at 24 cm (L band) and 5.6 cm (C band) wavelengths were reduced to interferograms showing apparent surface deformation over the 6‐month interval and over a succession of 1‐day intervals in October. A statistically significant local phase signature in the 6‐month interferogram is coincident with the Pu'u O'o lava vent. Interpreted as deformation, the signal implies centimeter‐scale deflation in an area several kilometers wide surrounding the vent. Peak deflation is roughly 14 cm if the deformation is purely vertical, centered southward of the Pu'u O'o caldera. Delays in the radar signal phase induced by atmospheric refractivity anomalies introduce spurious apparent deformation signatures, at the level of 12 cm peak‐to‐peak in the radar line‐of‐sight direction. Though the phase observations are suggestive of the wide‐area deformation measured by Global Positioning System (GPS) methods, the atmospheric effects are large enough to limit the interpretation of the result. It is difficult to characterize centimeter‐scale deformations spatially distributed over tens of kilometers using differential interferometry without supporting simultaneous, spatially distributed measurements of refractivity along the radar line of sight. Studies of the interferometric correlation of images acquired at different times show that L band is far superior to C band in the vegetated areas, even when the observations are separated by only 1 day. These results imply longer wavelength instruments are more appropriate for studying surfaces by repeat‐pass observations.</jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (9)*注記

もっと見る

問題の指摘

ページトップへ