Toward a better understanding of fish‐based contribution to ocean carbon flux

  • Grace K. Saba
    Center for Ocean Observing Leadership, Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences Rutgers University New Brunswick New Jersey USA
  • Adrian B. Burd
    Department of Marine Sciences University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
  • John P. Dunne
    NOAA/OAR/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton New Jersey USA
  • Santiago Hernández‐León
    Instituto de Oceanografía y Cambio Global, IOCAG Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Unidad Asociada ULPGC‐CSIC Telde, Gran Canaria Canary Islands Spain
  • Angela H. Martin
    Centre for Coastal Research, Department of Natural Sciences University of Agder Kristiansand Norway
  • Kenneth A. Rose
    University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Horn Point Laboratory Cambridge Maryland USA
  • Joseph Salisbury
    Ocean Processes Analysis Laboratory University of New Hampshire Durham New Hampshire USA
  • Deborah K. Steinberg
    Virginia Institute of Marine Science William & Mary, Gloucester Point Virginia USA
  • Clive N. Trueman
    Ocean and Earth Science University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus Southampton UK
  • Rod W. Wilson
    Department of Biosciences University of Exeter Exeter UK

Description

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Fishes are the dominant vertebrates in the ocean, yet we know little of their contribution to carbon export flux at regional to global scales. We synthesize the existing information on fish‐based carbon flux in coastal and pelagic waters, identify gaps and challenges in measuring this flux and approaches to address them, and recommend research priorities. Based on our synthesis of passive (fecal pellet sinking) and active (migratory) flux of fishes, we estimated that fishes contribute an average (± standard deviation) of about 16.1% (± 13%) to total carbon flux out of the euphotic zone. Using the mean value of model‐generated global carbon flux estimates, this equates to an annual flux of 1.5 ± 1.2 Pg C yr<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. High variability in estimations of the fish‐based contribution to total carbon flux among previous field studies and reported here highlight significant methodological variations and observational gaps in our present knowledge. Community‐adopted methodological standards, improved and more frequent measurements of biomass and passive and active fluxes of fishes, and stronger linkages between observations and models will decrease uncertainty, increase our confidence in the estimation of fish‐based carbon flux, and enable identification of controlling factors to account for spatial and temporal variability. Better constraints on this key component of the biological pump will provide a baseline for understanding how ongoing climate change and harvest will affect the role fishes play in carbon flux.</jats:p>

Journal

Citations (1)*help

See more

Report a problem

Back to top