Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation

書誌事項

公開日
2005-11-07
権利情報
  • https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/
DOI
  • 10.5194/nhess-5-853-2005
公開者
Copernicus GmbH

説明

<jats:p>Abstract. The predictive power of logistic regression, support vector machines and bootstrap-aggregated classification trees (bagging, double-bagging) is compared using misclassification error rates on independent test data sets. Based on a resampling approach that takes into account spatial autocorrelation, error rates for predicting "present" and "future" landslides are estimated within and outside the training area. In a case study from the Ecuadorian Andes, logistic regression with stepwise backward variable selection yields lowest error rates and demonstrates the best generalization capabilities. The evaluation outside the training area reveals that tree-based methods tend to overfit the data. </jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (4)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ