Gamma Interferon Release Assays for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection

  • Madhukar Pai
    McGill International TB Centre and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • Claudia M. Denkinger
    McGill International TB Centre and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • Sandra V. Kik
    McGill International TB Centre and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • Molebogeng X. Rangaka
    Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine and Centre for Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Alice Zwerling
    Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Olivia Oxlade
    Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  • John Z. Metcalfe
    Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  • Adithya Cattamanchi
    Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
  • David W. Dowdy
    Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • Keertan Dheda
    Department of Medicine and UCT Lung Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • Niaz Banaei
    Department of Pathology and Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA

抄録

<jats:title>SUMMARY</jats:title> <jats:p> Identification and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) can substantially reduce the risk of developing active disease. However, there is no diagnostic gold standard for LTBI. Two tests are available for identification of LTBI: the tuberculin skin test (TST) and the gamma interferon (IFN-γ) release assay (IGRA). Evidence suggests that both TST and IGRA are acceptable but imperfect tests. They represent indirect markers of <jats:named-content content-type="genus-species">Mycobacterium tuberculosis</jats:named-content> exposure and indicate a cellular immune response to <jats:named-content content-type="genus-species">M. tuberculosis</jats:named-content> . Neither test can accurately differentiate between LTBI and active TB, distinguish reactivation from reinfection, or resolve the various stages within the spectrum of <jats:named-content content-type="genus-species">M. tuberculosis</jats:named-content> infection. Both TST and IGRA have reduced sensitivity in immunocompromised patients and have low predictive value for progression to active TB. To maximize the positive predictive value of existing tests, LTBI screening should be reserved for those who are at sufficiently high risk of progressing to disease. Such high-risk individuals may be identifiable by using multivariable risk prediction models that incorporate test results with risk factors and using serial testing to resolve underlying phenotypes. In the longer term, basic research is necessary to identify highly predictive biomarkers. </jats:p>

収録刊行物

被引用文献 (4)*注記

もっと見る

詳細情報 詳細情報について

問題の指摘

ページトップへ