Cochlear Implantation in Inner Ear Malformations: Systematic Review of Speech Perception Outcomes and Intraoperative Findings
-
- Zachary Farhood
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Saint Louis University St Louis Missouri USA
-
- Shaun A. Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
-
- Stephen C. Miller
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
-
- Meredith A. Holcomb
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
-
- Ted A. Meyer
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
-
- and Habib G. Rizk
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of South Carolina Charleston South Carolina USA
書誌事項
- 公開日
- 2017-04-04
- 権利情報
-
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
- DOI
-
- 10.1177/0194599817696502
- 公開者
- Wiley
この論文をさがす
説明
<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>(1) To analyze reported speech perception outcomes in patients with inner ear malformations who undergo cochlear implantation, (2) to review the surgical complications and findings, and (3) to compare the 2 classification systems of Jackler and Sennaroglu.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Data Sources</jats:title><jats:p>PubMed, Scopus (including Embase), Medline, and CINAHL Plus.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Review Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Fifty‐nine articles were included that contained speech perception and/or intraoperative data. Cases were differentiated depending on whether the Jackler or Sennaroglu malformation classification was used. A meta‐analysis of proportions examined incidences of complete insertion, gusher, and facial nerve aberrancy. For speech perception data, weighted means and standard deviations were calculated for all malformations for short‐, medium‐, and long‐term follow‐up. Speech tests were grouped into 3 categories—closed‐set words, open‐set words, and open‐set sentences—and then compared through a comparison‐of‐means <jats:italic>t</jats:italic> test.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Complete insertion was seen in 81.8% of all inner ear malformations (95% CI: 72.6‐89.5); gusher was reported in 39.1% of cases (95% CI: 30.3‐48.2); and facial nerve anomalies were encountered in 34.4% (95% CI: 20.1‐50.3). Significant improvements in average performance were seen for closed‐ and open‐set tests across all malformation types at 12 months postoperatively.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Cochlear implantation outcomes are favorable for those with inner ear malformations from a surgical and speech outcome standpoint. Accurate classification of anatomic malformations, as well as standardization of postimplantation speech outcomes, is necessary to improve understanding of the impact of implantation in this difficult patient population.</jats:p></jats:sec>
収録刊行物
-
- Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
-
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 156 (5), 783-793, 2017-04-04
Wiley